Why GitHub is important for book publishing
The history of the 21st century will be the story of non-hierarchical systems of human organization enabled by the Internet.
The history of the 21st century will be the story of non-hierarchical systems of human organization enabled by the Internet.
The Open Access Button directly reachs out to scholars who publish their work in paywalled journals to ask them to legally share their research.
Analyzing Open Access levels across all countries and fields of research with Google Scholar data.
A fresh take on scientific workforce diversity approaching it as a scientific opportunity rather than as an intractable problem.
Significant strides in improving public access to scholarly publications and digital data help usher in an era of open science.
The case of Switzerland is a clear example of how a "no" vote could damage UK science.
Peer review is a thankless task, but journals have been experimenting with accolades and cash incentives for scientists who serve as peer reviewers.
Traditional values will not serve us well when it comes to debating the ethics of novel technologies such as self-driving cars. We need a new moral code.
Researchers hope that a more pluralistic parliament will put an end to interference and slipping standards.
This study investigates the relationship between research group size and productivity in the life sciences in the UK and shows that the number of publications increases linearly with group size, but that the slope is modest relative to the intercept, and that the relationship explains little of the variance in productivity.
Winning a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is hard, especially if it's your first one. New data from a pilot project called the Early Career Reviewer (ECR) Program suggest that sitting in judgment of other grant applicants can help young scientists improve their odds when they apply for their own grants.
Scientists who use government money to conduct genomic research will be required to quickly share the data they gather under a policy announced on Wednesday by the NIH.
Many scientists still not bothering to address an issue that undermines the reproducibility of research findings.
Many researchers are positive about the new, burgeoning science culture, but they still hesitate to enter into an open exchange of knowledge. There are many reasons why – such as a lack of knowledge about data management and the fear of intellectual property theft.
Pressure to publish short articles removes details, leaves readers confused.
Dodgy results are fuelling flawed policy decisions and undermining medical advances. They could even make us lose faith in science. New Scientist investigates
New rules could stop state-funded scientists advising ministers and make it easier for companies and campaign groups to sway government decisions
How to address high tech’s missing XX factor
Academics are getting out of touch with the rest of society. This helps explains the sorry state of our public discourse on science.
The ‘no costs’ fallacy is based on the idea that for a commercial publisher, manuscripts are free, peer review is free, editorial boards are free, and electronic dissemination is free.
Anyone who looks at international rankings has noticed that Switzerland is rising rapidly up the global academic hierarchy. Sweden and the Netherlands are close behind. This is no coincidence.
Bill Radke talks to Paul Basken, science policy reporter for the Chronicle of Higher Education, about how we should consume news that reports on scientific research.
This reports show that the UK research base is not only at the cutting edge of scientific and academic discovery, but also is doing more to translate this into practical wider benefits. This helps to keep us ahead in the global race.
The fascinating story of the discovery of nuclear fission began with an error that earned Enrico Fermi (see picture) a Nobel Prize for the apparent but incorrect discovery of the transuranic elements. Careful repetition and extension of the experiments finally led to the correct interpretation by Hahn, Meitner, Strassmann, Frisch, and Bohr as an effect from nuclear fission of the “small impurity” of (0.7 %) contained in natural uranium.
The privacy backlash over Cambridge Analytica and Facebook may lead to explosive consequences for academics.