NIH aims to beef up clinical trial design
NIH wants to expand the sharing of summary data from clinical trials, such as test results being reviewed here at NIH’s clinical center.
NIH wants to expand the sharing of summary data from clinical trials, such as test results being reviewed here at NIH’s clinical center.
Dr. Joerg Heber has been appointed Editor-in-Chief of PLOS ONE.
But UK students at universities abroad will lose out from the falling pound
It’s the most wondrous time of the year! Peer Review Week is the time when the scholarly communications community comes together to recognise the importance and value of peer review and peer review…
Citation metrics are very influential and their normalization is a contentious issue. Each normalization approach has advantages and disadvantages that need to be understood for proper use of these metrics.
Looking forward to Peer Review Week, we asked the Chefs “What is the future of peer review?”
The solution to science's replication crisis is a new ecosystem in which scientists sell what they learn from their research.
Emma Sayer Lecturer, Lancaster University Despite increased efforts to improve gender equality in academia, gender bias still affects many areas of science.
The peer-review system, despite its flaws, is a central component of the publication process. However, relatively little guidance is provided for early-career scientists on 2 important aspects of peer review:
This paper presents a brief overview of emerging policies to open up access to research data in the United States.
Don't believe every science study you read, because sometimes not even their authors believe them. Here are the issues corrupting good, honest science – and how to fix them.
Today, a scientist's most desired citation may be from a publication not often thought of as prestigious: Wikipedia.
Two and a half years ago now, a narrow majority of the Swiss electorate approved the so-called popular 'Stop Mass Immigration' initiative or MEI proposed by the Swiss People’s Party or SVP...
Postdoc positions in industry can teach people skills that they would not learn in academia.
Investigators are now required to disclose all clinical trials, whether successful or not.
Science is a public good and deserves to be valued more highly and used effectively by decision-makers at all levels.
As a researcher who gets such severe criticism, you have to go through the 5 stages of grief...
As we celebrate Peer Review Week, this post summarizes some of the reviewer preferences along with ways to boost recognition for peer review activities.
New program aims to recruit and retain early-career scientists who are from gender, racial, ethnic, and other groups underrepresented in the life sciences, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Although peer review is now a fundamental quality control measure implemented during the publishing process, the practice as we know it today is quite different from how it was envisioned...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is suing predatory journal publishing company, OMICS Group, for hiding fees and deceiving researchers. It's a first for the largely unregulated industry.
The relatively new exception to copyright law that we enjoy in the UK, permitting text and data mining (TDM) for the purposes of non-commercial research, offers potential to further knowledge and make scientific and medical breakthroughs.
An interview with Tom Culley, Marketing Director of Publons, on how provide recognition for this vital part of the scientific process.
Postdoc positions in industry can teach people skills that they would not learn in academia.
ScienceOpen has teamed up with OpenAIRE and Digital-Science, alongside two of their portfolio companies – Figshare and Overleaf, to organise an OpenCon ‘satellite’ event to be held in Berlin on the 24-26th November.
Peer reviews created by self-generated text machines are the latest threat to scientific integrity.
Anonymous individual or group claims that 22 papers from the University of Tokyo contain fabricated or falsified data.
Scientists incentivised to publish surprising results frequently in major journals, despite risk that such findings are likely to be wrong, suggests research.
Poor research design and data analysis encourage false-positive findings. Such poor methods persist despite perennial calls for improvement, suggesting that they result from something more than just misunderstanding.
Organizers of national neuroscience projects meet to coordinate goals.