What if universities had to agree to refund grants whenever there was a retraction?
Leonid Schneider argues for a new way to ensure accountability for publicly funded research. It has become clear that scientific dishonesty is rarely sanctioned.
Leonid Schneider argues for a new way to ensure accountability for publicly funded research. It has become clear that scientific dishonesty is rarely sanctioned.
The 100 most international universities in the world 2015.
Plans to double the government's investment in fighting antibiotic resistance by spreading roughly $1.2 billion in funding across several federal agencies.
Amid sanctions and a financial crisis, Dmitry Livanov discusses ongoing reforms to science funding.
Another set of ideas for fixing the funding crisis for young researchers.
Some early career scholars feel there is not enough support for academics who reach out, say Richard Watermeyer and Jamie Lewis.
In the 1970s, radical scientists thought they could change the world - if they could change science first.
Study on the benefits of competition in providing incentives to scientists and the adverse effects of competition on resource sharing, research integrity and creativity.
Low citation rates in the humanities are not at all the result of a lower average number of references per paper but are caused by the low fraction of linked references which refer to papers published in the core journals covered by WoS.
We need to assess who gets funded based on research merit, not journal label.
The history of the 21st century will be the story of non-hierarchical systems of human organization enabled by the Internet.
White House plan would increase research and development funding but faces rough road in Congress.
Surveys find broad support for government to spend money on science, but that doesn’t mean the public supports the conclusions that scientists draw.
Why the Norwegian Research Council is taking a stand against hybrid Open Access journals.
Anne Glover, former chief scientific adviser to the president of the European commission, gives a frank account of the highs and lows of her three years in Brussels.
The truth can be hard to find with millions of data points and lots of room for error.
A wide range of essential under-the-radar tasks sustain academic culture, but who will perform them in an increasingly careerist academy?
The research excellence of academics is often measured by the quantity and quality of their scholarly publications. But how do we know that all authors listed on a publication have actually been involved in the research?
This study investigates the relationship between research group size and productivity in the life sciences in the UK and shows that the number of publications increases linearly with group size, but that the slope is modest relative to the intercept, and that the relationship explains little of the variance in productivity.
Race inequality remains prevalent throughout all areas of higher education, including staffing, admissions and employment, according to a report released by leading UK race equality think tank the Runnymede Trust.
Both the public and scientists value the contributions ofscience, but there are large differences in how each perceives science issues.
The website is called The Scientific 23 because each interviewee was asked 23 questions.
If you can read this sentence, you can talk with a scientist. Well, maybe not about the details of her research, but at least you would share a common language.
A new computer simulation explores just how sensitive the process might be to bias and randomness. Its answer: very.
NIH's proposal-an "emeritus" award that senior scientists would use to pass their work on to younger colleagues and wind down their labs is being blasted in the blogosphere.
Male professors are brilliant, awesome and knowledgeable. Women are bossy and annoying, and beautiful or ugly. These are a few of the results from a new interactive chart that was gaining notice on social media.