Why null results rarely see the light of day
Why null results rarely see the light of day
Researchers have put numbers on the “file drawer” phenomenon, in which scientists abandon results that they believe journals are unlikely to publish.
Researchers have put numbers on the “file drawer” phenomenon, in which scientists abandon results that they believe journals are unlikely to publish.
We explore the feasibility and consequences of a Biblioleaks event for researchers, journals, publishers, and the broader communities of doctors and the patients they serve.
If so, the current funding system shares much of the blame.
Researchers around the world love their work, but tight funding is eroding their spirits.
Academia doesn’t make the grade as a training ground for today’s world
Are there any lessons to be learnt from the field of healthcare quality which could improve our approach to assessing research quality?
Faut-il un conseiller scientifique en chef pour la Commission Européenne ?
George Church is a genetics pioneer whose research spans treating diseases, altering bodies and a desire to breed woolly mammoths
Gisou van der Goot, professeure à l’EPFL, a récemment été confirmée dans son poste de doyenne de la faculté de Sciences de la vie de l'EPFL.
We know that those Open Access policies that work are the ones that have teeth. Both institutional and funder policies work better when tied to reporting requirements.
The Scientific Foresight (STOA) Unit analyses the implications and options for future policy-making in science and technology related fields for the European Parliament.
The number of funded applications per year was found to correlate well with total annual citation impact, suggesting that improving funding success rates by reducing the size of awards may be an efficient funding strategy to optimize the scientific impact of research program portfolios.
This paper provides useful insights for the design of networks that promote research productivity. Overall, dense networks negatively affect the creation of new knowledge. In addition, the analysis shows that a division of labor in academia, in the sense of interdisciplinary research, increases the productivity of researchers. It is also found that the position in a network is critical. Researchers who are central tend to create more knowledge.
Comparing Intra-EU and U.S. Mobility
71 per cent went to 31 universities because of 'narrowed' definitions of excellence
MacArthur Fellows data shows that creative scientists are highly mobile.
A new agreement with the European Union means that Swiss researchers are eligible for some Horizon 2020 grants.
Reforms must now be implemented at the Member State level to make ERA work.
Investment pool, at $250 Million, would be among biggest targeted for student and faculty research
Business sponsorship 'enables' gender-specific recruitment at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Latest update of the interactive ranking table to explore the world's top universities.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is in first place in the latest league table of the world's best universities.
When the Nobel Prize in Physics was to be announced, Peter Higgs decided it would be a good day to get out of town. Unfortunately, his car wasn't working.
Although thinking is the core business of scientists, we rarely ponder how it thrives best; this is ironic, as there is abundant scientific insight to draw upon.
I have never liked how scientific journals charge us to read the research that we produce. But that is another debate for another day. What I really hate is how they abuse this power to stifle debate in the name of their business interests.
The PLOS Pathogens team reflects on their most widely shared article and the benefits and pitfalls of sharing science research on social media.
10% of all postdocs stay in academia but nearly 80% hope to pursue an academic career
The sciences can be a sanctuary for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals, but biases may still discourage many from coming out.
Scientific debates often blur the lines between the science that is being debated and the political, moral, and legal implications that come with its societal applications. This manuscript traces the origins of this phenomenon to professional norms within the scientific discipline.