Betting on the Result
Experts are good at betting which scientific experiments can replicate despite some studies not being repeatable.
Experts are good at betting which scientific experiments can replicate despite some studies not being repeatable.
Women are underrepresented relative to men as colloquium speakers, yet women neither decline talk invitations at greater rates nor question the importance of talks more than men do.
Scientists now know more about what makes Lil Bub such a unique feline.
The funder-driven push for freely accessible scholarly literature has divided the scientific community.
Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus praise the growing scrutiny of scientific publications.
Common compliance situations can get good researchers into trouble, warn James M. DuBois and colleagues.
The U.S. presidential election shows how far the political conversation has degenerated from the nation's founding principles of truth and evidence.
When we reject failure, we create a culture of punishment, artificial rewards, and scientific bias. There are people running analyses and experiments right now which others will have undoubtedly done before, but just not communicated their results.
The author argues that the two biggest forces driving change in the scholarly communication landscape are consolidation and regulation. By consolidation, he means that there’s a now constant cycle of mergers and acquisitions, reducing the number of independent players in the market. By regulation, we’re talking about the increasing number of rules and the compliance burden being put on researchers.
Why has the UK government returned to an industrial strategy abandoned in the 1980s?
Scientists warn the devil is in detail of the European Commission’s latest open access plan, while publishers argue prohibiting researchers from submitting their work to certain journals is a threat to academic freedom.
University of California and Dutch publisher fail to strike deal that would allow researchers to publish under open-access terms.
BMC Biology's 'portable peer review' policy aims to save editors and researchers time and effort, but academics question whether authors will want to share details of past rejections.
What you should look for in an academic friend.
The bibliometric system and the rules which accompany it have created an environment in which many if not most researchers can be identified as transgressors.
The integration of AIRA - Artificial Intelligence Review Assistant - into Frontiers' digital peer-review platform enables faster, more efficient quality control and manuscript handling.
All software used for the analysis should be either carefully documented or, better yet, openly shared and directly accessible to others.
Climate change is the perfect example of how a cut-and-dry scientific issue can become controversial if it is represented consistently in partisan terms. Let’s not drag funding into the fray as well.
One of the UK's leading female astronomers is to donate her GBP2.3M winnings from a major science prize she was awarded. The sum will go to fund women, under-represented ethnic minority and refugee students to become physics researchers.
Space missions can continue to collect data, but thousands of federal researchers are forced to stay home without pay.
Novel breakthroughs in research can have a dramatic impact on scientific discovery but face some distinct disadvantages in getting wider recognition.
Researchers seeking science funding can be big losers in the equality and diversity game.
The decision by The Review of Higher Education, a highly respected academic journal, to temporarily suspend submissions due to a backlog of more than two years’ worth of articles awaiting reviews or publication set off a twitter storm and much debate in the corridors of academia about the future of academic publishing, and in particular its very foundation, blind peer review.
Stencila launches the first version of its word processor and spreadsheet editor designed for researchers.
The replication crisis in science is largely attributable to a mismatch in our expectations of how often findings should replicate and how difficult it is to actually discover true findings in certain fields.
The sharing of research results, the free circulation of knowledge, and transparency in methodology are key tenets to the scientific method.