Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Why STEM Majors Need the Humanities

Why STEM Majors Need the Humanities

It’s often argued that studying the liberal arts will enrich the life of the mind. For STEM majors, it can also give them a practical advantage in their careers.

Why Scientists Must Learn to Communicate With the Public

Why Scientists Must Learn to Communicate With the Public

Evading science communication simply because it is difficult, time-consuming or not important enough reflects more on how much scientists value their own work and its place in posterity.

Publication Bias and the Canonization of False Facts

Publication Bias and the Canonization of False Facts

Publication bias, in which positive results are preferentially reported by authors and published by journals, can restrict the visibility of evidence against false claims and allow such claims to be canonized inappropriately as facts.

How Does a US President Settle On His Science Policy?

How Does a US President Settle On His Science Policy?

Innovation is a huge part of economic growth – and the White House needs to be well-informed on science and tech issues when setting goals and budgets. Here's how presidents get up to speed.

Why Having a (Nonfinancial) Interest Is Not a Conflict of Interest

Why Having a (Nonfinancial) Interest Is Not a Conflict of Interest

A current debate about conflicts of interest related to biomedical research is to question whether the focus on financial conflicts of interest overshadows “nonfinancial” interests that could put scientific judgment at equal or greater risk of bias.

Don't Be A Zero-Sum Reviewer

Don't Be A Zero-Sum Reviewer

Time devoted to research is increasingly precious to us in academia. We chastise ourselves for not being able to keep up with the huge volumes of current literature. If only there was some way that all the latest literature on a particular topic could be packaged together for us, and delivered right to our inbox without us even having to lift a finger! Now, what would we call such an improbable utopia – ah yes, peer review.

Mapped Out: Negative Perceptions of Science

Mapped Out: Negative Perceptions of Science

This map shows that across Africa, India, Central America and parts of the Middle East, people are more likely to believe that one of the “bad effects” of science is that it “breaks down ideas of right and wrong”.

Why Researchers Should Resolve to Engage in 2017

Why Researchers Should Resolve to Engage in 2017

Debates over climate change and genome editing present the need for researchers to venture beyond their comfort zones to engage with citizens — and they should receive credit for doing so.

Scientists should not resign themselves to Brexit

Scientists should not resign themselves to Brexit

Leaving the European Union is not yet a done deal, and UK researchers must look past a pay-off and take a stand, says Colin Macilwain.

It's Not Just Politics: 2016 Was an Epidemic Year for Fake News in Science, too

It's Not Just Politics: 2016 Was an Epidemic Year for Fake News in Science, too

One of the watchwords of politics in 2016 was the epidemic of “fake news” — a catch-all term encompassing propaganda, misinformation, disinformation and hoaxing — impinging on the presidential campaign. But let’s not overlook its spread in the spheres of science and medicine.

What Happens to Rejected Papers?

What Happens to Rejected Papers?

Neuroskeptic« No Need To Worry About False Positives in fMRI?What Happens to Rejected Papers?By Neuroskeptic | January 3, 2017 2:43 pm32The pain of rejection is one that every scientist has felt: but what happens to papers after they’re declined by a journal?In a new study, researchers Earnshaw et al. traced the fate of almost 1,000 manuscripts which had been submitted to and rejected by ear, nose and throat journal Clinical Otolaryngology between 2011 to 2013.