Einstein shows: Not only citations count
Publications don't have to be successful immediately. This is shown by an article of Albert Einstein and colleagues that gained importance 85 years after having been published. By Anton Zeilinger.
Send us a link
Publications don't have to be successful immediately. This is shown by an article of Albert Einstein and colleagues that gained importance 85 years after having been published. By Anton Zeilinger.
Divertion of Horizon cash to investment fund will boost financial 'firepower', says Carlos Moedas.
Advertising science as a driver of economic growth is a long‐term losing strategy.
The same organisations that make it difficult to get a grant can be ridiculously laid back about how their money is spent once they have signed it over.
A policy change that could discourage UK government scientists from talking to the media is a backwards step. All researchers need to speak up to put science on the political agenda.
The case of the human-computer interaction community.
Online survey to explore the culture of research in the UK and its effect on ethical conduct in science and the quality of research.
Consumer-oriented websites allow researchers to compare the merits of scientific journals and review their publishing experiences..
Every cutting-edge science by definition has to be DIY. The super-resolution microscopes for which this year’s Nobel was awarded couldn’t be bought in a store: Betzig, Hell, Moerner and colleagues had to build them themselves.
HHMI, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Simons Foundation launch Faculty Scholars Program to give promising early-career scientists a boost.
BioMed Central is retracting 43 papers possibly involving third-party companies selling the service.
Harold Varmus, a Nobel Prize winner who has led the National Cancer Institute at the NIH for nearly 5 years, said he will step down from his post effective at the end of this month.
Ryoji Noyori, long-time president of Japan's RIKEN network of basic-research laboratories, has resigned after a year in which the organization was embroiled in controversy over fraudulent stem-cell papers.
Behind the headlines are exciting initiatives that have the potential to, not just improve peer review, but optimize it for 21st century scholarship.
"Peer review is mortally sick" according to Vitek Tracz.
Much of our contemporary approach to publishing research began with the launch of that journal, but what does the future hold?
Europe's research commissioner Carlos Moedas on funding models, diplomacy and scientific advice.
US funding agencies are turning to a Silicon Valley entrepreneur to focus fledgling biomedical companies on success — even when that means making a scientific course correction.
Study comparing the difference in the impact between open access and non-open access articles.
What if every creative endeavor had to go through Peer Review?
When researchers collect or select data or statistical analyses until nonsignificant results become significant.
The latest report on retracted publications in the PubMed database.
The researchers also point out that artists and filmmakers, in addition to journalists, could help pull compelling narratives out of all that science.
Biomedical researchers look to post-publication peer review to build grant funding case.
The first of a number of independent reviews of the policy during the transition period (five years from the policy being introduced), and covers the first 16 months, April 2013 to July 1014, of the policy’s implementation.
"Open Humans" project backed by Knight and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation invites individuals to share their most personal health information to accelerate medical breakthroughs.
Swiss researchers who work in the US are having trouble keeping their bank accounts in Switzerland due to complications from long-standing tax evasion issues between the two countries.