Senate panel approves public access bill
Senate panel approved a bill that would require U.S. science agencies to make the peer-reviewed research papers they fund freely available to the public.
Send us a link
Senate panel approved a bill that would require U.S. science agencies to make the peer-reviewed research papers they fund freely available to the public.
Research Councils UK has published its response to the independent Review of the implementation of the RCUK policy on Open Access, chaired by Professor Sir Bob Burgess.
More than 1,000 artificial intelligence researchers have signed an open letter issued that calls for a ban on autonomous weapons that select and engage targets without human intervention.
Google's biotech Calico will delve into the genetic database amassed by a unit of Ancestry.com to look for hereditary influences on longevity.
The new Scopus Article Metrics module includes new metrics based on four alternative metrics categories.
Is public money being thrown away on scientific research whose results won’t hold up to scrutiny?
Scientists on social media debate a call to require PhD students to replicate research before they can graduate.
What if I told you that half of the studies published in scientific journals today - the ones upon which news coverage of medical advances is often based - won't hold up under scrutiny?
What are the right lessons to draw from the rise in scientific retractions?
Europe’s researchers have access to super-fast networks, common data storage facilities, and shared computing resources. The challenge now is to link them all together into a single science cloud.
Harness Horizon 2020 to maximise the impact and benefit of EU funds, argue Mike Galsworthy and Martin McKee.
Kurt Deketelaere looks at the battles, and progress, of the Juncker Commission's first nine months, and sees more of both to come.
[32]Crowdfunding | Is crowdfunding a viable source of clinical trial research funding?
[33]Misconduct | Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct
Survey results released last week by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) included an interesting nugget. Some 72% of respondents said that they had been unable to replicate a published experimental result. Yet a higher proportion (77%) said that they had never been told that their work could not be replicated.
Dalmeet Singh Chawla rounds up the recent discussion about single figure publications.
Massive study seeks to succeed where others failed, but faces tight deadline and questions about strategy.
Cindy Wu, a recent college graduate, had a great idea — and when she explained it, investors opened up their checkbooks
Active problem-solving confers a deeper understanding of science than does a standard lecture. But some university lecturers are reluctant to change tack.
The single figure publication is a novel, efficient format by which to communicate scholarly advances. It will serve as a forerunner of the nano-publication, a modular unit of information critical for machine-driven data aggregation and knowledge integration.
The difficulty in replicating research findings has been at the center of the attention in the specialized and lay press for a number of years and is more recently attracting the attention of the Administration and Congress.
This leaflet presents some initial results of the She Figures 2015 data collection. It provides data on the proportions of women and men amongst top level graduates and researchers.
PEERE is a project funded by the European Union to explore issues around journal and grant peer review, running from 2014 to 2018.
Better communication between labs may resolve many reproducibility problems, according to [28]report.
Simplified processes save time and money that could be reallocated to actual research. Funding agencies should consider streamlining their application processes.
This study uses a bibliometric method to examine the relationship between two journal characteristics during 2009–2013: the article processing charges and the percentage of published articles based on work that is supported by grant-funded articles.
The time has come for the life scientists, funding agencies, and publishers to discuss how to communicate new findings in a way that best serves the interests of the public and scientific community.
Miguel Seabra has stepped down as president of research-advocacy group Science Europe with immediate effect. Elisabeth Monard, secretary-general of the Research Foundation Flanders, will be acting president until it elects a new president at its general assembly in November.
Perception that time should be spent improving research prowess.