Artificial intelligence institute launches free science search engine
Semantic Scholar comes from centre backed by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen.
Send us a link
Semantic Scholar comes from centre backed by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen.
ORCID has announced the launch of Auto-Update functionality, in collaboration with Crossref and DataCite.
University of California expands the reach of its research publications by issuing a [3]Presidential Open Access Policy, allowing future scholarly articles authored by all UC employees to be freely shared with readers worldwide.
Graduate students dream of academia but are keeping their career options open, according to a 2015 Nature survey.
A decades-long surge in the numbers of US biomedical postdocs may finally have ended..
There are just 79 scientists per million Africans, compared to 4,500 per million people in the United States.
What benefit does a future scientist derive from knowing something about art and literature?
Some research funders have mandated in recent years that studies they finance be published in open-access journals, but they've given little attention to ensuring those studies include accessible writing.
Biomedical research has faced criticism for being unreliable, but a report from the Academy of Medical Sciences might change all that.
On [22]the incidence and role of negative citations in science.
White paper showing that the vast majority of authors believe that blind peer review helps to minimize discrimination.
An analysis of WoS data spanning more than 100 years reveals the rapid growth and increasing multidisciplinarity of physics, as well its internal map of subdisciplines.
Essay triggers lively arguments over how basic science should be funded.
"The internet has changed everything and people are simply no longer willing to pay $30 to read a paper from 1987."
A research review on funding and gender produced by the Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research, Gothenburg University.
A PLOS podcast dedicated to interviews with innovators and thought leaders on scholarly publishing developments, the future of academia and the changing experiences of scientists.
A timeline showing the major milestones in 10 years of Open Access at the Wellcome Trust.
The Wellcome Trust is to fund more long-term research projects because of fears that the pressure to publish and the need to show research impact will prevent academics from successfully tackling the world's most pressing challenges.
OpenCon 2015 will feature leading speakers from across the Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data movements including Mike Eisen (PLoS) and Jimmy Wales (Founder Wikimedia).
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) announced plans for two new peer-reviewed journals, Science Robotics and Science Immunology..
Many scientists still not bothering to address an issue that undermines the reproducibility of research findings.
Sixty three per cent of original research articles published to date on nature.com in 2015 are open access, nearly 10,000 papers. Ten years ago, NPG introduced its first fully open access journal. Today, NPG publishes over 80 journals with an open access option.
Giving the same information to multiple scientific teams can lead to very different conclusions, a report published today in Nature shows.
Some scientists the long-awaited paper of the Blue Brain Project, a 10-year program spearheaded by neuroscientist Henry Markram, as proof that the idea of modeling a brain and all of its components is misguided and a waste of money.
As an institution, science is not fond of privilege. Success in science is supposed to be the result of merit - hard work, tenacity and, to some degree, sheer luck - not nepotism, favoritism, or entitlement.
Scientific publishing has undergone a revolution in recent years - largely due to the internet. And it shows no sign of letting up as a growing number of countries attempt to ensure that research papers are made freely available. Publishers are struggling to adapt their business models to the new challenges.
Most scientists admit to their errors but, as Eve Marder explains, the scientific community as a whole needs to rethink the way it recognizes achievement.
Publishers should apply consistent policies to correcting the published literature and adopt versioning. The scientific community ought to encourage corrections.