Should AI Be Used in Science Publishing?
New technologies could make the scientific review process more objective and accurate — but some worry about the risks of letting computers determine what gets published.
Send us a link
New technologies could make the scientific review process more objective and accurate — but some worry about the risks of letting computers determine what gets published.
A clientside editor for decentralised article publishing, annotations and social interactions.
The rise of fake news has dominated the world of politics recently, but fake news is not at all new in the world of science.
A new study suggests that, contrary to common fears, the answer is no.
The Edward Snowden of peer review.
Editor asked to resign from journal for saying he’ll review only papers whose data he can see.
If you are a futurist or make predictions, send them to us, and the whole world will see them.
Why journal publishing should be upended from the current model, in which institutions pay publishers for access to content, to one in which the academic community pays for services to publish content and retains ownership of research.
As LinkedIn continues to reign as the world’s largest social network for the wider working world, we are seeing the rise of alternatives that are besting and beating it in specific verticals.
Amendments aim to protect autonomy and the independence of research funders from political interference.
A tool developed by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Basel to track Zika, Ebola and other viral disease outbreaks in real time.
A free, open-access journal designed to publish brief papers about research software.
Researchers must seek out others’ deposited biological sequences in community databases, urges Franziska Denk.
Goldman Sachs, the Wellcome Trust, and Bill Gates all put money into the Berlin company, which has over 12 million scientists on its platform.
The European Commission has changed the Horizon 2020 model grant agreement, to try to address complaints about low salary levels among the newer 13 member states.
How to take into account differences in standards, confidence and bias in assessment panels.
In 2016, Joel Pitt and Prof. Helene Hill published an intriguing paper with us looking at the prevalence of scientific fraud in preclinical research...
Q&A with Daniel Sarewitz, Professor of Science and Society at Arizona State University.
The problem of fake data may go far deeper than scientists admit. Now a team of researchers has a controversial plan to root out the perpetrators
WHO today published its first ever list of antibiotic-resistant "priority pathogens"—a catalogue of 12 families of bacteria that pose the greatest threat to human health.
It is often assumed that issue advocacy will compromise the credibility of scientists.
Preprints are clearly the future of scientific communication, but currently face multiple obstacles.
When firing Allen Braun, the NIDCD also barred his colleagues from publishing data collected over a 25-year period.
For a career-minded scientist, to fail to replicate your own work is worse than never doing the replication at all.