The value of publishing null results
The scientific community appears to have created a research environment where researchers either feel little point in writing up null results and/or struggle to publish such findings.
Send us a link
The scientific community appears to have created a research environment where researchers either feel little point in writing up null results and/or struggle to publish such findings.
In the 1st installment of 3 career-focused articles, scientists who completed books as early-career researchers reflect on the positive outcomes the experience had on their professional development.
In the 2nd installment of 3 career-focused articles, scientists contemplate why a book project was the perfect addition to the dynamic middle stage of their professional journeys.
In the 3rd installment of career-focused articles, scientists who completed books as experienced researchers reflect on how their networks paved the way for—and grew during—the publishing process.
Sarima 2025: Calls grow for unified African voice in research management and innovation
Brussels research lobbies, together with leading MEP Christian Ehler, are calling for more detail and clarity about the European Commission's €175 billion plan for the tenth Framework Programme (FP10).
On the eve of officially signing Switzerland's late association with Horizon Europe, both sides are thinking about how to avoid renewed disruption when a new set of bilateral accords is brought forward next year.
A constellation of static and dynamic indicators could provide a means for assessing the trustworthiness of published research.
With a boost from the Trump administration, organ chips, AI, and other technologies bid to replace animals for drug and chemical testing.
For science diplomacy to remain relevant in this era, it must develop a new mode of engagement—transactional science diplomacy.
Federal funders of research are increasing the stringency of their expectations that researchers make data collected in federally funded projects publicly available.
Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis, we show how different combinations of science, gender equality, and social policies interact to constitute five distinct national pathways for gender-fair early career progression.