Why scientists must share their research code
'Reproducibility editor' Victoria Stodden explains the growing movement to make code and data available to others
Send us a link
'Reproducibility editor' Victoria Stodden explains the growing movement to make code and data available to others
Reproducible, transparent and reliable science.
We present a set of computing tools and techniques that every researcher can and should adopt. These recommendations synthesize inspiration from our own work, from the experiences of the thousands of people who have taken part in Software Carpentry and Data Carpentry workshops over the past six years, and from a variety of other guides. Unlike some other guides, our recommendations are aimed specifically at people who are new to research computing.
Many researchers are positive about the new, burgeoning science culture, but they still hesitate to enter into an open exchange of knowledge. There are many reasons why – such as a lack of knowledge about data management and the fear of intellectual property theft.
The giant journal company said it was merely protecting its own proprietary system. But a wave of critics on social media said they were suspicious of its motives.
A contribution to the open innovation, open science, open to the world agenda 2016.
Science is a big thing, but changing it relies on simple decisions made by individual researchers.
Richard Morey on thinking about evidence, selling dog food, and how individual scientist can deal with the crisis in the social sciences.
Through highlighting six recent advances in research infrastructure, this whitepaper seeks to recast how we think about metadata - not as a series of static records, but as objects that move between systems and organizations.
Open source now runs the world. But it still faces problems
The OpenTrialsFDA team was selected as a finalist for the Open Science Prize.
Senator Elizabeth Warren called on researchers to make public data they collect while testing drugs and medical devices on patients. Others disagree.
Researcher who spent months chasing permission to republish online data sets urges others to read up on the law.
A new “papers service” for social science content was recently launched and is capitalizing on concerns over the sale of a long time preprint server by a commercial publisher.
The European Academies, including the Royal Society, have published a joint statement.
This guide covers three major topics in open science (data, code, and publications) and offers practical advice as well as highlighting advantages of adopting more open research practices.
A literature review demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities, and funding opportunities.
The European Commission recently held an open consultation seeking views on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain, including potentially expanding neighbouring rights to publishers. LIBER's Executive Director Susan Reilly recently attended a high-level working lunch with MEP Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, to present the view of research libraries on this issue.
The last few weeks have been a momentum time in the sciences: not because of a breakthrough in gene therapy or quantum computing, but because world leaders have twice called for scientific papers to be made freely available to all.
The sharing of research results, the free circulation of knowledge, and transparency in methodology are key tenets to the scientific method.
Integration of lab notebook tool will help researchers enrich their data and make it more suitable for reuse
The fast-moving field of gene-drive research provides an opportunity to rewrite the rules of the science, says Kevin Esvelt.
A two-day sprint event bringing together researchers, coders, librarians and the public from around the globe.
Elsevier just bought SSRN. Here’s why you should be upset, and what we can do about it.
Evolve governance structures, practices and metrics to accelerate innovation in an era of digital connectivity, writes Martin Curley.
Governments need to tighten regulation if the sharing of clinical-trial data is to succeed.
The open source physics site arXiv is turning 25, and it's going to get a makeover. But what does that mean for its principles of data transparency?
Team finalists receive $80,000 each to develop products to overcome hurdles in big data access and usage.
Notes on Open Science from the Barcamp Science 2.0 and the Science 2.0 Conference.