AI and Academic Peer-Review Process
AI and Academic Peer-Review Process
Scientists look to AI for help in peer review.
Send us a link
Scientists look to AI for help in peer review.
Broader forms of activism are needed to protect evidence-based policy.
As the European Research Council celebrates its 10-year anniversary, researchers reveal what more than €12bn of ERC funding has supported.
My uncle immigrated to the United States in 1956 with no assets, a brilliant mind, ambition, and a faith that America was a great country of opportunity. He escaped from Hungary, a country of communists, at the time a source of great fear among many US politicians. If the US President at his time were making policy similar to our President today, my uncle would’ve never been allowed in the US.
Revised text of a talk given by the Director of Libraries at MIT.
Diverse and controversial opinions are “a hallmark of MIT,” says director of MIT Media Lab.
A data set interrogation tool in the field of cell and molecular biology.
A platform enabling scientists to create, share and control open and affordable lab automation tools.
A beautiful new way to create and share research figures.
The constant demand for predatory journals has now exposed significant flaws in the academic research establishment that questions the integrity of the research system.
A resource-centric communication protocol for for decentralised article publishing, annotations and peer to peer interactions.
The Google-owned star British AI company DeepMind is in talks with the National Grid about a potential partnership.
The EOSCpilot project will support the first phase in the development of the European Open Science Cloud.
The number of backers a product attracts during crowdfunding predicts its financial success in the marketplace – not the amount of money raised.
Open access publishing is gaining more and more momentum, and post-publication peer review is becoming more common. Those developments have both upsides and downsides.
The finalists of the 2017 Wellcome Image Awards have been announced, showcasing the best science-related imagery from the past year. This year’s crop features a bioluminescent squid, a high-tech contact lens, and a microscopic ‘brain’ on a chip.
Springer Nature becomes the largest academic publisher to open up reference lists to advance data discovery and reuse, effective as of today. Working closely
Environmental scientists and policymakers value long-term research to an extent that far outstrips the amount of funding awarded for it.
There’s this pervasive idea that science is somehow exempt from the ugly political world in which the rest of us wallow. But even a perfunctory look at the history of American science shows that this hasn’t always been the case.
Diego Gomez, a Colombian graduate student, currently faces up to eight years in prison for doing something thousands of researchers do every day: posting research results online for those who would not otherwise have a way to access them.
If you are a futurist or make predictions, send them to us, and the whole world will see them.
The rise of fake news has dominated the world of politics recently, but fake news is not at all new in the world of science.
A clientside editor for decentralised article publishing, annotations and social interactions.
New technologies could make the scientific review process more objective and accurate — but some worry about the risks of letting computers determine what gets published.
A tool developed by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Basel to track Zika, Ebola and other viral disease outbreaks in real time.
A free, open-access journal designed to publish brief papers about research software.
Emory College of Arts and Sciences has launched a $1.2 million effort that positions it to be a national leader in the future of scholarly publishing. The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation is funding the multiyear initiative to support long-form, open-access publications in the humanities in partnership with university presses.
For a career-minded scientist, to fail to replicate your own work is worse than never doing the replication at all.
Soft skills like teamwork and communication could boost undergraduates' career prospects.