French Plant Biologist Cleared of Misconduct in New Inquiry
National research council absolves one previously sanctioned lab leader of misconduct, and holds another researcher responsible.
Send us a link
National research council absolves one previously sanctioned lab leader of misconduct, and holds another researcher responsible.
Scientists receive too little peer-review training. Here's one method for effectively peer-reviewing papers, says Mathew Stiller-Reeve.
Drug companies make big contributions to analysis in the trials they fund but can fail to report their contributions.
To assess whether research is relevant to society, ask the stakeholders, say Catherine Durose, Liz Richardson and Beth Perry.
Knowledge generated in partnership with the public and policymakers is more likely to be useful to society and should be encouraged.
Robert-Jan Smits takes Plan S to the White House and says he is in the United States for ‘business not chit-chat’.
We suggest that moving from an authorship to a contributorship model would better reflect the many and varied contributions to large, complex, long-term and management-intensive projects in modern science.
The prize-awarding academies are making changes to their secretive nomination processes to tackle bias, but some say the measures don’t go far enough.
Seven researchers and campaigners tell Nature how Britain’s break-up with the EU is affecting research.
Nation’s funder is the first to join Plan S - which aims to make all scientific works free to read on publication - since the effort was announced.
How to step out from the shadow of your principal investigator.
Respect for what you and your colleagues bring to the table is vital to successful integration.
Marine biologists are using artificial intelligence to help them identify objects in millions of images.
If we really want transdisciplinary research, we must ditch the ordered listing of authors that stalls collaborative science.
The National Science Foundation's rules for reporting harassment by grant recipients are the strictest yet instituted by a US government science agency.
Collaboration across institutes can train students in open, team science, which better prepares them for challenges to come.
Even sophisticated, data-driven models of academic careers have trouble forecasting the highs and lows.
Governing board of the evidence-based medicine group may now be dissolved entirely.
As artificially intelligent tools for literature and data exploration evolve, developers seek to automate how hypotheses are generated and validated.
To highlight uncertain norms in authorship, John P. A. Ioannidis, Richard Klavans and Kevin W. Boyack identified the most prolific scientists of recent years.
'Most highly cited' criterion is not the most appropriate.
Scientists in emerging economies respond fastest to peer review invitations but are invited least.