Metaphysicians
Launch of METRICS, the Meta-Research Innovation Centre at Stanford, by John Ioannidis.
opinion articles
Send us a link
Launch of METRICS, the Meta-Research Innovation Centre at Stanford, by John Ioannidis.
At some point we must decide whether we want excellent science or nationally representative science.
An article on what is needed for personalized medicine to be reality. "Research into how genetic variants can guide successful treatments must become part of routine medical practice and records", says Geoffrey Ginsburg.
Comment on the paper Predicting publication success for biologists.
Chief Executive of the ESPRC, has no regrets over the introduction of the council's exercise which prioritises funding according to UK strength and national importance.
"Today people look at these extraordinary labs and forget that in the 1800s they could still do the exact same science." -- Manu Prakash
Report points to 'serious dangers for the international standing of UK research' in humanities and social sciences.
What could the UK academic community do with £14.5 million? That is what just 19 Universities in the UK are spending in total during a single year on journal subscriptions to a single publisher.
Aside from the occasional cigar (once every five years or so), I'm one of those smug "never smoked" gits. You then might think that I'm all for plain packaging, not publishing tobacco industry-funded research, and completely against the " normalization" of smoking via the evidently evil medium of e-cigarettes.
Academic-industry research collaborations have long been a source of controversy in medicine.
Wirtschaftsforscher warnen vor Unterfinanzierung der Grundlagenforschung
"Die Schweizer Forschung wird künftig international sein oder gar nicht mehr sein."
The age at which Nobel prize winners receive their prizes has increased dramatically, especially in physics.
Felipe Fernández-Armesto bristles at the stifling effect of peer review.
The sudden appearance of data scientists on the business scene reflects the fact that companies are now wrestling with information that comes in varieties and volumes never encountered before.
There is no doubt that big data is a valuable tool that has already had a critical impact in certain areas. But because of its popularity, we need to be levelheaded about what big data can and can’t do.
Anne Glover, Chief Scientific Adviser to the European Commission, discusses evidence-based policy and nurturing and supporting a European scientific culture.
Open Access, Open Science, Science 2.0 - die Titel, unter denen vom Internet eine Beschleunigung des Erkenntnisgewinns erwartet wird, sind vielfältig. Doch wem nützen die entsprechenden Techniken?
Scientists go to great lengths to ensure that data are collected and analysed properly, so why do they apply different standards to data about the number of times research papers have been cited and viewed?
There has been an upsurge in philanthropy for scientific research by America's billionaires. Still, in size and scope, philanthropy pales in comparison to public financing for science.
Merciless competition for jobs and funds pushes some researchers to spin data in the eternal quest for success
Should paywalls stand between the taxpaying public and publicly funded research? Congress recently decided that the answer should be "no."
Scientific mavericks once played an essential role in research. We must relearn how to support them and provide new options for an unforeseeable future.
US scientists should not be placated by the ‘flat budget’ myth. Funds are decreasing, and the situation will get worse.
Former Purdue University president France Córdova inherits an agency at a crossroads.
As online comments on newly published research become widespread, a new dilemma faces scientists wanting to enter the electronic fray: where to comment, and in what format for maximum impact?
Brian D. Wright and colleagues present data challenging the assumption that corporate-funded academic research is less accessible and useful to others.
As government financing of basic science research has plunged, private donors have filled the void, raising questions about the future of research for the public good.