Pilot Programme Encourages Researchers to Share the Code
New project, partly designed by a University of Cambridge researcher, aims to improve transparency in science by sharing ‘how the sausage is made’.
New project, partly designed by a University of Cambridge researcher, aims to improve transparency in science by sharing ‘how the sausage is made’.
The synthetic biology community is divided.
Scientists around the world fear the Mexican government is trying to send a message to those who would dare question it.
Many doctors on the front lines say unvaccinated patients in their 20s and 30s are becoming more severely ill, and more quickly. But comprehensive data is lacking.
Approximately one-fifth of papers with supplementary Excel gene lists contain erroneous gene name conversions.
A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship.
Now we know how suppression decisions are made, should metrics companies suppress titles at all or simply make the underlying data more transparent?
It is remarkable that the sharing of academic research was the genesis of the modern web, yet today remains one of the last bastions of non-free content on the web.
Studies suggest that a reversal of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision would be detrimental for many.
Obtaining a more joined up picture of financial flows is vital as a means for researchers, institutions and others to understand and shape changes to the sociotechnical systems that underpin scholarly communication.
Have scientists failed to tell the story of climate change? Do fiction writers do it better? A climate scientist and science fiction writer in conversation.
Weâre interested in hearing about the challenges faced by early-career scientists worldwide, especially if you've recently started your own lab, are struggling to maintain a lab, or have left research. We want to hear your stories. Your answers may feature in articles published by Nature's news team.
A homeopathy journal was recently booted from the list of respectable scientific titles — but why was it among the ranks in the first place?
A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications.
Or why we should choose what to fund at random.
In this blog, I will examine the hypothesis that blogs are, on average, of higher quality than journal articles.
Openness and politicization together have enabled public trust in science to erode. And science is insufficiently trustworthy. The scholarly communication sector must not ignore this situation.
John Ioannidis argues that problem base, context placement, information gain, pragmatism, patient centeredness, value for money, feasibility, and transparency define useful clinical research. He suggests most clinical research is not useful and reform is overdue.
When you pay for something, you expect to receive it. Whether a physical good or a service, there is the rightful expectation that you will receive something in exchange for your money. The same should be true for scientific research.
The science and engineering workforce has aged rapidly, both absolutely and relative to the workforce, which is a concern if the large number of older scientists crowds out younger scientists.
Breaking the cycle in which only highly profitable drugs reach the market is not just the responsibility of government.
Ever wish you could just publish an exciting result, without having to wait for the entire string of data that follows in order to tell an entire story, which then gets held up for months by peer review at traditional journals?