Gender Bias in Scholarly Peer Review
Using public information about the identities of 9000 editors and 43000 reviewers from the Frontiers series of journals, we show that women are underrepresented in the peer-review process.
Using public information about the identities of 9000 editors and 43000 reviewers from the Frontiers series of journals, we show that women are underrepresented in the peer-review process.
The impact of crisis of reproducibility on the patent system.
A new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine says that the US research community needs to do a better job of both investigating misconduct allegations and promoting ethical conduct.
The results, from a survey of UC Berkeley students in the physical sciences and engineering, highlight a stumbling block for diversity and inclusion efforts—but also offer a potential bright spot
A systematic approach to identifying and analyzing scientists on Twitter.
Machines still have a long way to go before they learn like humans do – and that’s a potential danger to privacy, safety, and more.
Gene-edited seedless tomatoes don’t need pollinating to produce fruit – which could come in useful at a time when bees are on the decline
First new outstation in 18 years strengthens city's biomedical profile
Consider biomedical preclinical and clinical research, in which the trusted service involves the exchange of papers, data, software, reagents, and so on.
Brain drain to Western nations has apparently left researchers in Eastern Europe with fewer foreign co-authors.
How is machine learning becoming increasingly intertwined with a range of research fields?
All stakeholders in the scientific research enterprise -- researchers, institutions, publishers, funders, scientific societies, and federal agencies – should improve their practices and policies to respond to threats to the integrity of research, says a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Learn about the open access publishing model in Latin America which helps disseminate scientific knowledge without restrictions.
As per a new open access policy, all academic research from Dutch scientists should be made available under gold open access by 2024.
The process for correcting a published article can be needlessly burdensome. So some researchers have decided to take matters into their own hands.
A new Council of Graduate Schools report that highlights the lack of career development support at many institutions also offers some useful resources.
A message from eLife early career group made up of graduate students, post docs, and junior group leaders of the eLife early-career advisory board.
Venture capitalists are bright, clannish and almost exclusively male
You might see science as splashy headlines and a barrage of new results—but in the background are people with emotions and ambitions, politics, and a system that promotes publishing novel findings above all. A new paper on eel navigation highlights some of these systemic troubles.
Some lessons from the health community’s long battle with misinformation.
An approach that may be tried in the Netherlands would do away with peer review and just let researchers give each other money.
Post-publication peer review emerged in response to increased calls for continuous moderation of the published research literature.
As researchers prepare for the science march, it's worth noting that the flip-side of Trump's anti-science is a sort of alt-science appeasement on the left.
The growing need for collaboration among young scientists is more essential now than ever before, with careers in research becoming more uncertain and perilous.
Bulgaria is set to lose millions of euros in EU funding aimed at modernising the country’s research infrastructure and stimulating its innovation potential, apparently due to its inability to select independent evaluators.