4th World Conference on research integrity
The 4th World Conference on Research Integrity will take place in Brazil in June 2015 sponsored by the Wellcome Trust, AAAS, NPG, EMBO and others.
The 4th World Conference on Research Integrity will take place in Brazil in June 2015 sponsored by the Wellcome Trust, AAAS, NPG, EMBO and others.
For a second year running, rOpenSci is excited to announce another R unconference in March 2015 at GitHub's headquarters in San Francisco.
Negative findings matter too and new OA publications are helping researchers to give a fuller account of themselves.
Republicans in the US Congress have put the NSF under the microscope, questioning its decisions on individual grants and the purpose of entire fields of study.
An astonishingly small number of elite universities produce an overwhelming number of professors.
Psychology has been home to some of the most infamous cases of fraud in recent years, and while it's just a few bad apples who are spoiling the bunch, the field itself has seen an overall increase in retractions.
Times Higher Education's definitive list of the top 100 most powerful world university brands.
This month marks the 350th anniversary of arguably the first and longest-running scientific journal, Philosophical Transactions: Giving Some Accompt of the Present Undertakings, Studies, and Labours of the Ingenious in Many Considerable Parts of the World.
A new report suggests more sharing of research equipment may be a better way of getting more bang out of the science funding buck than clawing back ‘efficiency savings’ out of grant funding.
Giving equal weight to everybody’s opinion might be the worse thing you could do.
Nature is offering anonymity for both reviewer and reviewed, but questions remain about value and effectiveness of the approach.
The HBP should be remade into an international organization modeled on CERN or the EMBL in Heidelberg, says a panel formed to unite the neuroscience community.
International graduate students and their decisions to stay or leave the U.S. upon graduation.
The exponential growth in the number of scientific papers makes it increasingly difficult for researchers to keep track of all the publications relevant to their work. Consequently, the attention that can be devoted to individual papers, measured by their citation counts, is bound to decay rapidly.
This paper presents three case studies describing the use of altmetrics across three research-intensive higher education institutions in the UK and USA.
Livre blanc sur la visibilité de la recherche française : enquête et recommandations.
This data tool illustrates the extent to which the scientific community is losing a talented workforce.
Scientific journal articles will become freely available, thanks to new policies at major U.S. science agencies.
Wiley is piloting a partnership with Publons to give you official recognition for your peer review work. This partnership means you can opt-in to have your reviews for participating Wiley journals automatically added to your reviewer profile on Publons.
Personal genetics firm 23andMe has revealed it is to launch a new drug discovery and development division.
Ukraine will now be able to fully participate in Horizon 2020 on equal terms with EU Member States and other associated countries.
The next president of the Royal Society will be the Nobel-winning Cambridge researcher Prof Sir Venki Ramakrishnan. He will succeed geneticist Sir Paul Nurse in December 2015.
Swiss researchers who work in the US are having trouble keeping their bank accounts in Switzerland due to complications from long-standing tax evasion issues between the two countries.
Reasons for removing time-bound criteria from MRC fellowship applications to help give people the time they need.
The professionally trained scientists who make decisions on biology papers at the big journals with the big journal impact factors have significantly less scientific experience and far weaker publication records than the editors of lower journal impact factor biology journals.
When people talk about the flaws in the scientific process, they often raise the problem of peer review. Right now, when a researcher submits an article for publication in a journal, it's sent off to his or her peers for constructive criticism or even rejection.
Free from bureaucracy, independent science labs offer a flexibility that can't be matched by universities.
Things are improving for women working in most STEM-based fields, although there are some notable exceptions.