Data Management Made Simple
Keeping your research data freely available is crucial for open science — and your funding could depend on it.
Send us a link
Keeping your research data freely available is crucial for open science — and your funding could depend on it.
Plan U: A proposal to achieve universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates.
Hundreds of scientists across the federal government have been forced out, sidelined or muted since President Trump took office.
When you think of innovation, you also may think of patents and profits. But two Swiss researchers argue that we should be focusing more on people and places.
Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences
These days, a scientist has to publish a steady stream of research articles to be “successful.” But two new studies argue that that kind of pressure promotes sloppy science at the expense of careful work.
Authors, editors and publishers differ in their understanding of and the value they attach to the purposes of peer review.
Science popularization inclines laypeople to underrate their dependence on experts.
The White House is working to assemble a panel to assess whether climate change poses a national security threat, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post, a conclusion that federal intelligence agencies have affirmed several times since President Trump took office.
New Jersey may seem an unlikely place to measure climate change, but it is one of the fastest-warming states in the nation. Its average temperature has climbed by close to 2 degrees Celsius since 1895 — double the average for the Lower 48 states.
Data from several lines of evidence suggest that the methodological quality of scientific experiments does not increase with increasing rank of the journal.
Researchers at Harvard Medical School said it was time to ponder a startling new prospect: synthetic embryos.
Discussions of how to improve research quality are predominant in a number of fields, including education. But how prevalent are the use of problematic practices and the improved practices meant to counter them?
Current research trends resemble the early 21st century’s financial bubble. Let’s imagine what might happen if the rules of professional science evolved such that scientists were incentivized to publish as many papers as they could and if those who published many papers of poor scientific rigor were rewarded over those who published fewer papers of higher rigor?
There is little reason to expect that preregistration will spontaneously help researchers to develop better theories (and, hence, better methods and analyses).
It turns out that defining "raw" is a little trickier than it might seem.
Reflecting on the plight of the early career scholar prompts Xenia Schmalz to draw up a research manifesto.
Societal impact should be rated more highly in scientific publishing and research evaluation. To this end, we suggest that ways to achieve it should be introduced as an important component of curricula at higher-education institutions.