The benefits of negative science
A new JAMA study found the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is silent on matters of scientific misconduct and fraud.
Send us a link
A new JAMA study found the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is silent on matters of scientific misconduct and fraud.
The ‘no costs’ fallacy is based on the idea that for a commercial publisher, manuscripts are free, peer review is free, editorial boards are free, and electronic dissemination is free.
The PDF makes reading science research even more difficult and prevents a two-way conversation from taking place.
An analysis linking the number of researchers in a lab to productivity spurs online debate.
Quality control in science journals is evolving, with a code of ethics in hot pursuit.
Reproducibility alone is insufficient to address the replication crisis because even a reproducible analysis can suffer from many problems that threaten the validity and useful interpretation of the results.
FundRef provides a standard way to report funding sources for published scholarly research.
How scientists can use Twitter to expand their social contacts and find jobs.
A new computer simulation explores just how sensitive the process might be to bias and randomness. Its answer: very.
NIH's proposal-an "emeritus" award that senior scientists would use to pass their work on to younger colleagues and wind down their labs is being blasted in the blogosphere.
White House plan would increase research and development funding but faces rough road in Congress.
Surveys find broad support for government to spend money on science, but that doesn’t mean the public supports the conclusions that scientists draw.
Why the Norwegian Research Council is taking a stand against hybrid Open Access journals.
Anne Glover, former chief scientific adviser to the president of the European commission, gives a frank account of the highs and lows of her three years in Brussels.
The truth can be hard to find with millions of data points and lots of room for error.
A wide range of essential under-the-radar tasks sustain academic culture, but who will perform them in an increasingly careerist academy?
The research excellence of academics is often measured by the quantity and quality of their scholarly publications. But how do we know that all authors listed on a publication have actually been involved in the research?
This study investigates the relationship between research group size and productivity in the life sciences in the UK and shows that the number of publications increases linearly with group size, but that the slope is modest relative to the intercept, and that the relationship explains little of the variance in productivity.
Race inequality remains prevalent throughout all areas of higher education, including staffing, admissions and employment, according to a report released by leading UK race equality think tank the Runnymede Trust.
Both the public and scientists value the contributions ofscience, but there are large differences in how each perceives science issues.
The website is called The Scientific 23 because each interviewee was asked 23 questions.
If you can read this sentence, you can talk with a scientist. Well, maybe not about the details of her research, but at least you would share a common language.
We need to assess who gets funded based on research merit, not journal label.
The history of the 21st century will be the story of non-hierarchical systems of human organization enabled by the Internet.
The 100 most international universities in the world 2015.
Plans to double the government's investment in fighting antibiotic resistance by spreading roughly $1.2 billion in funding across several federal agencies.
Amid sanctions and a financial crisis, Dmitry Livanov discusses ongoing reforms to science funding.
Another set of ideas for fixing the funding crisis for young researchers.