"In Zukunft erhält bei uns jeder Doktorand einen Vertrag"
How the Max-Planck Society (MPS) wants to improve the condition of PhDs. Interview with Martin Stratmann, President of the MPS.
Send us a link
How the Max-Planck Society (MPS) wants to improve the condition of PhDs. Interview with Martin Stratmann, President of the MPS.
US science and engineering professors preferred female job candidates by two to one.
How do reviewer recommendations influence editor decisions? And are Chinese authors treated fairly?
Open access isn't just some "free culture" refrain. It really matters and can save lives.
The Web was invented to enable scientists to collaborate.
Nature readers favour creating more secure jobs to fix science’s broken postdoctoral system.
Nature Biotechnology asks peer reviewers to check accessibility of code used in computational studies.
The $3-million state initiative will coordinate with a national effort to promote individualized patient treatment.
Tech firms can banish sexism without sacrificing the culture that made them successful.
In recent years science has entered a crisis of trust. The results of many scientific experiments appear to be surprisingly hard to reproduce, while mistakes have highlighted flaws in the peer review system.
There are no valid arguments to support the recent trend toward seven-figure salaries for high-ranking university administrators.
A survey of 307 reviewers of submissions to the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems to gain a better understanding of their motivations for reviewing.
Evidence from 34 OECD countries.
Writing and reviewing journal articles is part of the core business of a scientist. But it’s not an efficient way to communicate research results.
This dataset contains projects funded by the EU under the H2020. Grant information is provided for each project, including reference, acronym, objective, title, total cost, EC contribution, start date, end date, duration, Call Id, Topic, Funding Scheme, legal basis.
If you are a scientists sharing our concerns you can add your name in the support form on the right.
Olivier Voinnet, a researcher at ETH in Zurich is retracting a 2004 paper in The Plant Cell, according to the journal's publisher.
Robert Weinberg, a prominent cancer scientist whose papers often notch hundreds or thousands of citations, has lost a fourth paper, this time a 2009 publication in Cell.
There is a growing number of postdocs and few places in academia for them to go. But change could be on the way.
The Cell paper has been cited 150 times, according to Web of Science, while the Nature paper has been cited 40. The Nature paper has not yet been retracted.
Institutional public access plans for Open Science.
ORCID has been awarded an 18-month, $3 million grant by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust to develop the infrastructure and capacity to support international adoption and technical integration of ORCID identifiers.
For half a century, the government funded research. Times are changing.
Biological data will continue to pile up unless those who analyse it are recognized as creative collaborators in need of career paths, says Jeffrey Chang.
Publications don't have to be successful immediately. This is shown by an article of Albert Einstein and colleagues that gained importance 85 years after having been published. By Anton Zeilinger.
Divertion of Horizon cash to investment fund will boost financial 'firepower', says Carlos Moedas.
Advertising science as a driver of economic growth is a long‐term losing strategy.
The same organisations that make it difficult to get a grant can be ridiculously laid back about how their money is spent once they have signed it over.