Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Leveraging Concepts in Open Access Publications

Leveraging Concepts in Open Access Publications

This paper addresses the integration of a Named Entity Recognition and Disambiguation (NERD) service within a group of open access (OA) publishing digital platforms and considers its potential impact on both research and scholarly publishing.

Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development

Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development

Completed revised second draft of a document that aims to agree on a broad, international strategy for the implementation of open scholarship that meets the needs of different national and regional communities but works globally.

 

Open Access Books Attract Many More Readers and Slightly More Citations

Open Access Books Attract Many More Readers and Slightly More Citations

Academics who offer their books free online reach many more readers and are cited slightly more often. Surprisingly enough, it has little effect on the sale of paper editions, positive or negative.

A Response to UCL's "Response to Plan S"

A Response to UCL's "Response to Plan S"

A response from Robert Kiley, Head of Open Research at the Wellcome Trust, to UCL’s “Response to Plan S”.

Good Practice Principles for Scholarly Communication Services

Good Practice Principles for Scholarly Communication Services

Science and scholarship are critical to improving our lives and solving the world’s most intractable problems. The communication of research, a vital step in the research process, should be efficient, effective and fulfill the core values of scholarship.

Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation

Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation

Quantitative performance ratings are ubiquitous in modern organizations — from businesses to universities — yet there is substantialevidence of bias against women in suchratings. This study examines how gender inequalities in evaluations dependon the design of the tools used to judge merit. 

FinELib's Negotiations with Taylor & Francis Hit a Wall - FinELib

FinELib's Negotiations with Taylor & Francis Hit a Wall - FinELib

Negotiations between the FinELib consortium and Taylor & Francis ended with no positive results. The end of the negotiations means that access to Taylor & Francis journals will end on 1 February 2019.

PRESS RELEASE: Researchers Respond to Implementation of Plan S | Eurodoc

PRESS RELEASE: Researchers Respond to Implementation of Plan S | Eurodoc

Read the joint response to the implementation guidance forPlan S as issued by three organisations representing early-career and senior researchers in Europe.

AmeliCA Vs Plan S: Same Target, Two Different Strategies to Achieve Open Access

AmeliCA Vs Plan S: Same Target, Two Different Strategies to Achieve Open Access

AmeliCA is a multi-institutional community-driven initiative supported by UNESCO that arises in response to the international, regional, national and institutional contexts of Open Access, which seeks a collaborative, sustainable, protected and non-commercial solution for Open Knowledge in Latin America and the Global South.

Feeling Exhausted

Feeling Exhausted

There is the accumulated evidence from multiple studies of the disadvantage women in science suffer, with specific reference to the fields of anthropology, ecology and evolution

Progressing Towards Transparency - More Journals Join Wiley's Transparent Peer Review Pilot

Progressing Towards Transparency - More Journals Join Wiley's Transparent Peer Review Pilot

Wiley claim they are committed to moving towards greater openness and reproducibility of research, including increasing transparency in peer review

Additional Points in My Plan S Response

Additional Points in My Plan S Response

Further to my other post earlier this week, I have added the additional points to my response letter to the Plan S implementation guidelines. These centre around monographs (9), REF involvement in Plan S (10), infrastructural support (11), the "time of publication" (12), clarification of the term "quality" (13), compliance of existing software with repository requirements (14), publisher deposition (15), and the ability to pursue defamation suits for wrongful attribution and reputational damage with the waiver of moral rights under CC BY 4.0 (16). If number 16 could be resolved, the open licensing landscape would be much clearer. The full letter is now available.

Wellcome Open Research: Summary of Year 2

Wellcome Open Research: Summary of Year 2

Robert Kiley, Head of Open Research, Wellcome and Michael Markie, Publishing Director, F1000 highlight Wellcome Open Research's achievements after two years of publishing. 

Launching the OLH Advocacy Network

Launching the OLH Advocacy Network

In 2018, the OLH launched the EmpowOA programme, designed to provide scholars and librarians working in the humanities with tools, spaces and cogent arguments about open access. Now, the OLH extend the functionality for the visitors to the website

Report Results from Clinical Trials or Be Called to UK Parliament to Explain Why Not

Report Results from Clinical Trials or Be Called to UK Parliament to Explain Why Not

UK universities could be brought in front of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee if they fail to improve the reporting of clinical trials. 

Open Data Day 2019 Mini-grant Scheme

Open Data Day 2019 Mini-grant Scheme

Open Data Day is the yearly event where we gather to reach out to new people and build new solutions to issues in our communities using open data. To make sure some of those events have everything they needed to be great for their communities, mini-grants for the people organizing Open Data Day events will be provided.

The Data Opportunities for Publishers in 2019 - Silverchair

The Data Opportunities for Publishers in 2019 - Silverchair

How has the open data movement matured over 2018 and what opportunities does it create for publishers in 2019? 

My Draft Plan S Implementation Guidance Feedback

My Draft Plan S Implementation Guidance Feedback

I write to provide feedback in an individual capacity on the Plan S implementation guidelines.

European Parliament Petition on Elsevier and the Open Science Monitor - Green Tea and Velociraptors

European Parliament Petition on Elsevier and the Open Science Monitor - Green Tea and Velociraptors

Elsevier's role in the EU's Open Science Monitor is examined more closely.

Guidelines on How to Successfully Design, and Implement, Mission-oriented Research Programmes

Guidelines on How to Successfully Design, and Implement, Mission-oriented Research Programmes

SSH is crucial for succcess of programmes. These guidelines provide useful tools for those who deal - in one way or another - with research funding programmes.

Harvard Library and MIT Libraries Provide Recommendations for Plan S Implementation

Harvard Library and MIT Libraries Provide Recommendations for Plan S Implementation

Harvard Library and the MIT Libraries are in broad support of Plan S and its goals while also recomending certain adjustments to the implementation details.

Why We Need a Public Infrastructure for Data on Open Access

Why We Need a Public Infrastructure for Data on Open Access

The necessity of developing a public infrastructure for open access, its benefits and the obstacles to reaching this goal.

Pay to Publish Open Access: On the DEAL-Wiley Agreement

Pay to Publish Open Access: On the DEAL-Wiley Agreement

Details of the contract between the German consortium DEAL and Wiley reveal that the transformative nature of this new big deal may come at a high cost.