Rethinking research impact
The way we think about the impact of university research, according to one Arizona State University leader, needs urgent and fundamental change.
Send us a link
The way we think about the impact of university research, according to one Arizona State University leader, needs urgent and fundamental change.
The “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” developed by the Trump administration and sent to nine universities on 1 October, proposes that the institutions agree to a series of criteria in exchange for preferential treatment in funding decisions. As of 20 October, various schools have responded to Trump’s offer.
From 2026, applicants for funding from two research councils must provide additional information on managing risk.
Academic freedom and the autonomy of science require protection not only against direct state interference, but also against the more subtle colonisation of research by political and economic systems.
What does Open Access promise and what does it cost? How can the crucial importance of open infrastructures be embedded as a collective core task? What could a new concept for financing Diamond Open Access look like? At the Open Access Days 2025, these and other questions were answered in lectures and workshops.
Reform needed to improve trust in science, patient care and training of AI, advocates say.
Scheme for unconventional ideas among those hit by Swiss National Science Foundation funding loss.
In December 2023, the press office for Science (and the Science family of journals) decided to explore whether ChatGPT Plus had potential as a tool to help writers
In exchange for continued taxpayer funding, American universities must better explain how research promotes the well-being and security of the public, according to two of the country’s top leaders in science policy.
These partnerships accelerate neuroscience by enabling researchers to share resources and expertise, as well as generate more relevant and reproducible results. But new federal funding restrictions in the United States are putting such collaborations in jeopardy.
Between January 20th and August 31st 2025, there have been 479 attacks on science, which undermine, co-opt, or blatantly ignore science in the federal government. These attacks follow the plan laid out in Project 2025.
Report highlights promise, questions about detectors of AI-generated text.
Experts call for African-led platforms and pooled funding to protect scientific visibility.
“Non-binding exploratory talks” with the EU have already started, bringing hope to research sector leaders.
Commercialisation has thwarted the promise of openness—it’s time for new priorities, says Samuel Moore