When you open the app you see one at random and you can rate it according to two criteria.

A voluntary commitment to the values of openness and transparency in science.

A place for academics to review the publishing process at peer-reviewed journals.

Who gets credit for the technology to cut-and-paste the human genome?

With a focus on deep reporting, a print magazine, and an intense affinity for illustrations, nonprofit Nautilus has taken an expensive approach to launching a new science publication.

An interview with Tom Culley, Marketing Director of Publons, on how provide recognition for this vital part of the scientific process.

The replication crisis in science is largely attributable to a mismatch in our expectations of how often findings should replicate and how difficult it is to actually discover true findings in certain fields.

Nobel prize winning ideas are not always accepted by the community.  By definition, they are paradigm shifting, revolutionary.

Encourage girls to explore scientific career paths.

Stephanie Wykstra Ivan Oransky Stuart Buck Brian Nosek Julia Galef (Moderator) How can we produce research findings that are both useful and robust?

We bring together scientists, engineers, programmers, business analysts, and journalists to disseminate best-practices in data visualization and accelerate the bleeding edge technology.

A mission-based, independent publisher standing for fairness and return approximately 25% of revenue to the research community.

Technologies based on the electronic analysis of large amounts of works are still in their infancy, and the possibilities they might open up in the future are largely unpredictable.

A practical Responsible Research and Innovation tools database

Lab Carpentry provides training resources and example documents for lab management to busy scientists.

Johns Hopkins University Press' Project MUSE online platform will host scholarly monographs and materials in humanities and social sciences.