Life outside the lab: The ones who got away
Sometimes, the brightest stars in science decide to leave. Nature finds out where they go.
Send us a link
Sometimes, the brightest stars in science decide to leave. Nature finds out where they go.
Europe's €1-billion science and technology project needs to clarify its goals and establish transparent governance.
Metrics that give a global overview risk sidelining science in developing nations.
With high numbers of postdocs emerging from universities, prospective PhD students must be prepared for the fact that they will probably not end up with a career in research.
Survey of 12 countries shows discontent with governments that prioritize short-term rewards.
People seeking non-academic jobs may need to try something unexpected to be noticed, says Peter Fiske.
NIH will assess whether grant reviewers are biased against minority applicants.
NSF awards $10.8 million in grants to support US government initiative.
Giant academic social networks have taken off to a degree that no one expected even a few years ago. A Nature survey explores why.
Open access science articles are read and cited more often than articles available only to subscribers, a study has suggested.
Earlier this year, at a symposium organized by Nature in Melbourne, Australia, a group of leading academics, funders and government advisers discussed how research outcomes are measured. This Nature Outlook was influenced by these debates.
Researchers working at the interface of disciplines can pursue insights without sacrificing career progress.
Thomson Reuters vows to be clearer about how science's most misused metric is calculated.
Anonymity of authors as well as reviewers could level field for women and minorities in science.
New policy follows efforts by other journals to bolster standards of data analysis.
Measures of research impact are improving, but universities should be wary of their limits.
Research-agency staff protest over slashed spending and concerns about country’s future research capability
Two retractions highlight long-standing issues of trust and sloppiness that must be addressed
Romance often sparks between colleagues, and scientists are no different. Nature profiles four super-couples who have combined love and the lab.
Anne Glover says that better access to evidence helps policy-makers to make informed choices.
Making early-career scientists change institutions frequently is disruptive and — with modern technology — unnecessary.
Members of the US National Academy of Sciences have long enjoyed a privileged path to publication in PNAS. Meet the scientists who use it most heavily.
The expanding economies of South America have led to a significant rise in scientific output over the past two decades, and research spending has increased in most countries. But given the region's share of the world's population and GDP, publication rates still fall short of what would be expected.
Nature announced the launch of its new journal: Scientific Data.
Signal of gravitational waves was too weak to be significant, studies suggest.
Launch of the new interdisciplinary Francis Crick Institute in central London.
The UK Government’s new prize for substantial innovation to address pressing societal problems should be welcomed, says Martin Rees.
Researchers will now be required to make papers free to read within one year of publication.
The impact factor (IF) of scientific journals has acquired a major role in the evaluations of the output of scholars. However, at the end of the day one is interested in assessing the impact of individuals. Here we introduce Author Impact Factor (AIF).