The manuscript-editing marketplace
A peer-to-peer website aims to disrupt the author-services industry.
Send us a link
A peer-to-peer website aims to disrupt the author-services industry.
The effects of federal budget cuts provide an opportunity to revisit the funding structure of the National Institutes of Health.
European collaboration is not far behind that in the United States, but there is still work to be done on cross-border funding and financial inequalities, says Paul Boyle.
Laura Niedernhofer is counting her pennies. The mid-career molecular biologist moved last year to the Scripps Research Institute's campus in Jupiter, Florida - a risky decision that saw her building a new laboratory group at a time when the US government was cutting its support for science.
The route to open-access publishing endorsed by the British government puts unacceptable strains on research budgets at a time of funding shortages. The report also argues for more transparency and competition in the costs of publishing research.
Technological change is accelerating today at an unprecedented speed and could create a world we can barely begin to imagine.
Only one-third of trials at US medical centres are reported within two years of completion.
The success rate of discoveries would be improved if we could find out how to innovate.
PhD holders should not underestimate their value to industry and the business sector.
Anders Hamsten, has resigned after acknowledging that he mishandled the prestigious Swedish institute's investigation into controversial surgeon Paolo Macchiarini.
ASAPbio meeting discusses the ins and outs of posting work online before peer review.
Many research advocates worry that the proposal could backfire in the face of political opposition.
High-profile physicist says his students' papers were wrongly rejected by the preprint server's volunteer moderators.
Scientists are becoming increasingly frustrated by the time it takes to publish a paper.
Mistakes in peer-reviewed papers are easy to find but hard to fix.
If the United Kingdom leaves the EU, researchers throughout the bloc will feel the effects.
In the face of routine rejection, many scientists must learn to cope with the insidious beast that is impostor syndrome.
It may not be sexy, but quality assurance is becoming a crucial part of lab life.
Stephan Lewandowsky and Dorothy Bishop explain how the research community should protect its members from harassment, while encouraging the openness that has become essential to science.
Big US report documents increases in international collaboration and Chinese science output.
A Harvard professor reveals how his hiring committee whittles down the pile of job applications.
Scientists who submit grant applications to the NIH will be required to explain the scientific premise behind their proposals and defend the quality of their experimental designs.
Space missions, carbon capture and gravitational waves are set to shape the year.
We asked four researchers who made the news in 2015 what they would change about how science gets done.
Peer-review platforms built around online pre-print repositories spread to astrophysics.
Creators of computer programs that underpin experiments don’t always get their due — so the website Depsy is trying to track the impact of research code.
Academic consortia urge faster changes in scholarly publishing.
Starting Jan 2016 Nature Communications will publish peer reviews alongside with the paper.
Scientists debate the merits of deleting journal names from their publication lists.