I Made My Grant Application Public
If funding applications were made under open access, science would benefit from more universal scrutiny.
Send us a link
If funding applications were made under open access, science would benefit from more universal scrutiny.
All the videos and slides from #scidata16.
Scientists should challenge online falsehoods and inaccuracies — and harness the collective power of the Internet to fight back, argues Phil Williamson.
Technology and practice can help shy and introverted researchers to succeed when reticence is risky.
Books have the power to trigger a lifelong urge to know more about the world and its environs.
Economic woes wrought by globalization are only part of the cause.
Consortium backed by US NIH is first major biology programme to mandate online publication of results ahead of peer review.
In an era of online discussion, debate must remain nuanced and courteous.
If politicians can lie without condemnation, what are scientists to do? Kathleen Higgins offers some explanation.
Guest post by Professor Elizabeth Loftus, winner of the 2016 John Maddox Prize
But grave challenges remain before the promise of individually tailored medicine becomes reality.
20% of the scientists undertook between 69% and 94% of reviews last year.
Following a £2 billion research pledge, questions remain around commitment to boost science investment.
Pressure to barrel through a PhD can make taking a break seem daunting — but there are ways to limit career damage.
Davide Vannoni is barred from offering a controversial stem-cell therapy in Italy but may be continuing his work abroad.
Biologists in particular are writing their papers in a less formal style.
Cap at current spending levels could spell 'end of science in Brazil', researchers say.
The move by Chinese scientists could spark a biomedical duel between China and the United States.
Journal experiments and surveys suggest scientists are coming round to the idea of publishing review reports. A few journals, such as PeerJ, the BMJ and F1000Research, already embrace open peer review in various different forms.
Nine experts reflect on where researchers should direct their efforts during the next US administration.
The majority of our authors are opting in to publish reviewer reports of their papers.
Biomedical funders worldwide are adopting the US agency’s free Relative Citation Ratio to analyse grant outcomes.
World Health Organization asks research initiatives to focus on translating their findings into clinical benefits.