Tracker is a Boon for Innovation in Peer Review
Nature welcomes a registry that supports experiments to improve refereeing.
Send us a link
Nature welcomes a registry that supports experiments to improve refereeing.
ReimagineReview records trials that are probing the pros and cons of different approaches to review.
The proportion of open-access publications with authors from the pharmaceutical industry doubled between 2009 and 2016.
University of California and Dutch publisher fail to strike deal that would allow researchers to publish under open-access terms.
As departure day approaches, chief of top UK lab says he fears science will drop off the government's agenda.
Six male researchers describe their efforts to support their female colleagues.
The hunt for male and female distinctions inside the skull is a lesson in bad research practice.
To be successful as researchers, we must be able to think through the impacts of our work on society and speak up when necessary.
Publishers say that the bold open-access initiative rules out proven ways of opening up the literature.
eLife's departing editor talks about the seismic changes he sees coming - and why some journals will lose out.
Australian chief scientist Alan Finkel calls for formal action to bake in better research practices.
Many academics have strong incentives to influence policymaking, but may not know where to start. Recent research has examined the ‘how to’ advice in the academic peer-reviewed and grey literatures.
Researchers say the policy could intensify existing issues with research quality and misconduct.
A new study suggests that making reviewers' reports freely readable doesn't compromise the peer-review process.
A planned $35-million upgrade could enable LIGO to spot one black-hole merger per day by the mid-2020s.
Following these guiding principles for sharing data can help researchers get ahead.
On the five-year anniversary of an uprising that propelled Ukraine away from Russia and towards Europe, scientists say things are improving too slowly.
Research needs an authoritative forum to hash out collective problems, argue C. K. Gunsalus, Marcia K. McNutt and colleagues.
A US project is exploring the use of software to assign confidence levels to published research.
Unlike most faulty research practices, fraud actively evades detection. It is also overlooked because the scientific community has been unwilling to have frank and open discussions about it.
Researchers have been left without access to new papers as libraries and the major publisher fail to agree on subscription deals.
Why some scientists choose to forgo promising careers abroad to return to their countries of birth.
Peace and EU membership have allowed scientists in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland to build a unique, cross-border research system.
As the chase for new elements slows, scientists focus on deepening their understanding of the superheavy ones they already know.
Laboratory heads need training, support and accountability to connect people across cultures.
Brigitte Van Tiggelen and Annette Lykknes spotlight female researchers who discovered elements and their properties.
More than 1 million studies are now downloaded from the site every month, mostly in neuroscience, bioinformatics and genomics.
Scientists with first-hand experience of rejection offer their advice.