P values are just the tip of the iceberg
Ridding science of shoddy statistics will require scrutiny of every step, not merely the last one.
Want to get your research noticed by politicians?
There’s no doubt political parties listen to think tanks. Using them to present academic work could help researchers penetrate the Westminster bubble.
Disrupting the subscription journals' business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access
Disrupting the subscription journals' business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access
This paper makes the strong, fact-based case for a large-scale transformation of the current corpus of scientific subscription journals to an open access business model.
Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Europe
This collection brings together agenda-setting essays by policymakers, practitioners, scientists and scholars from across Europe.
Beyond Bar and Line Graphs
Beyond Bar and Line Graphs
Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm.
Why are Authors Citing Older Papers?
With so much new literature published each year, why are authors increasingly citing older papers?
The retirement debate
You're in your 60s. Should you stay in the lab, or make way for the next generation?
Royal Society Open Science to tackle publication bias
[5]Royal Society Open Science aims to tackle the biases in traditional formats.
Work smart with Workspace, our new platform for writing papers
[8]F1000Workspace offers scientists a comprehensive suite of software and services to write and collaborate on papers, annotate and share references and articles, as well as easily discover and save relevant new articles.
First results from psychology's largest reproducibility test
An ambitious [11]effort to replicate 100 research findings in psychology ended last week - and the data look worrying.
The trouble with reference rot
Computer scientists are trying to shore up broken links in the scholarly literature.
Researchers to take on publishers over new EU copyright laws
Intense lobbying by scientists and journal publishing companies between now and the autumn is expected.
A time limit on postdoctoral contracts: the French experience
in 2012 a new law ordered French public employers to offer stable employment to workers after 6 years of short-term contracts. It backfired.
How to combat distrust of science
The surprising power of the psychology of consensus.
How we can break free from sexism in science
In academia, strong hierarchies and nepotism compound problems associated with biases.
Final report on Science 2.0 public consultation
[24]This report presents the key findings, the main areas of discussion and the policy recommendations emerging from the consultation.
A framework to explore the knowledge structure of multidisciplinary research fields
A framework to explore the knowledge structure of multidisciplinary research fields
Understanding emerging areas of a multidisciplinary research field is crucial for researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders. For them a knowledge structure based on longitudinal bibliographic data can be an effective instrument.
Ten simple (empirical) rules for writing science
Scientists receive much advice on how to write an effective paper that their colleagues will read, cite, and celebrate. Here we put this advice to the test, and measure the impact of certain features of academic writing on success, as proxied by citations.
Are replicability and reproducibility under-rated in science?
Special Issue on reproducibility in EuroScientist.
Are publisher profits justifiable?
It’s widely recognised that the established scholarly publishers skim an awful lot of money off the top of research budgets.
New mechanism for scientific advice
President Juncker welcomes world-leading scientists, discusses role of science in competitiveness and announces new mechanism for scientific advice.
Thumbs Down for the Freemium Model?
Researchers Reject Nature’s Fast Track Peer Review Experiment.
Researchers fret about downgrading of science minister role
Jo Johnson is smart and well-connected, but will not attend highest-level policy meetings.
EU science funding: 'the UK cannot afford to lose out on this pot of money'
The possibility the UK will vote to leave the EU would be a disaster for British science.
Will traditional science journals disappear?
Has the traditional format of the science journal had its day? Dorothy Bishop outlines an alternative model, based on consensual communication.
Where will the key ideas shaping the future of scientific publishing come from?
Key ideas behind the future of scientific publishing will be done primarily by two groups of outsiders: exceptionally creative user interface designers, and people who design group experiences.
A critical view of altmetrics
Altmetrics is one of the hotly debated topics in the Open Science movement today.
The five deadly sins of science publishing
This editorial describes the problems with the process of preparing and publishing research findings, and with judging their veracity and significance, and then explains how we at Faculty of 1000 are starting to tackle the ‘deadly sins’ of science publishing.
×