Memo for President Biden: Five Steps to Getting More from Science
Going back to normal is not enough. A revamp is required.
Send us a link
Going back to normal is not enough. A revamp is required.
The new president has the opportunity to reverse four years of anti-science policies - but he also inherits a nation divided.
With so many votes cast for Trump, some researchers conclude that they must work harder to communicate with the public.
Junior researchers need to engage with policymakers, institutions, funders and media outlets to argue against planned budget cut-backs.
How the US president and his administration have silenced scientists and meddled in their reports, with disastrous consequences.
Researchers in many countries need custom-built systems to do robust and transparent science.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute's six-figure donation is a step towards addressing racial injustice in the sciences.
The directive could make it easier to fire some agency researchers and hire others for political reasons.
The shift to virtual conferences needs to be accompanied by a sensitivity to people in different time zones.
Unchecked ivermectin use in region is making it difficult to test anti-parasite drug's effectiveness against the coronavirus.
During a pandemic, more researchers might require support from colleagues and depend on those partnerships to collect the data they need to keep their labs operational. The article presents guidelines for collaborations.
The arrangement will allow some researchers in Germany to publish openly - but critics say it comes with a high price.
Big moves to rebuild the scientific infrastructure are possible, argues Ulrich Dirnagl.
Publishers agree to make journal summaries open and searchable in single repository.
Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna share award for developing the precise genome-editing technology.
Face masks are vital to containing the spread of COVID, but lecturers and universities must find ways to be inclusive, say Olivier Pourret and Elodie Saillet.
The science supports that face coverings save lives, and yet the debate trundles on. How much evidence is enough?
Harvey Alter, Michael Houghton and Charles Rice share the award for research on a virus that causes hundreds of thousands of deaths a year.
The US president's actions have exacerbated the pandemic that has killed nearly 200,000 people, rolled back environmental and public-health regulations and undermined science and scientific institutions. Some of the harm could be permanent.
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute is the second major US funder to mandate that the research it pays for must be free to read on publication.
Researchers will also recommend an open-access policy that promotes research being shared in online repositories.
Amy Coney Barrett is likely to influence the court on environmental regulation and scientific expertise, say legal scholars.
Public trust in a potential vaccine is under threat. Drug companies and their academic partners must disclose protocols and results data.
Five international students and postdocs reflect on a turbulent year triggered by the Trump administration's visa restrictions.
Researchers warn that vaccines could stumble on safety trials, be fast-tracked because of politics or fail to meet the public's expectations.