Preprints and Journals: A Model Publishing Ecosystem
An inclusive view of preprints and published articles leads to a research ecosystem that is greater than the sum of the parts.
Send us a link
An inclusive view of preprints and published articles leads to a research ecosystem that is greater than the sum of the parts.
All papers reviewed by eLife as part of our new model will now be published as Reviewed Preprints.
Institutions owe it to young researchers to prepare them for careers outside academia. Preprint review is a perfect opportunity.
In the global supply chain of scholarly communications, we share a responsibility for accurate metadata that represents the publication lifecycle -- from preprint to version of record, and everything in between.
EMBO will accept first author refereed preprints in applications for postdoctoral fellowships in a four-month trial.
ASAPBio offers set of principles and guidelines for preprint feedback.
Biophysics Colab brings review and curation to biophysical preprints on Sciety
Efforts to share research with the public must include mechanisms to prevent harm resulting from low-quality work.
Will the plethora review options for preprints usher in a new age of duplicate peer review?
A sudden rule change by the Australian Research Council-to ban grant applications that cite preprint material-has deemed 32 early and mid-career researchers ineligible to receive critical funding.
At a recent meeting, a debate was held on the motion: Preprints are going to replace journals. The author was asked to oppose the motion and this post is based on their arguments.
A comparison of preprints and their final journal publications show discrepancies in results reporting and spins in interpretation.
As eLife transitions to exclusively reviewing preprints, we have integrated medRxiv into our submission process for the rapid sharing of new medical research.
ASAPbio has developed resources for preprint servers, institutions, scientists, and journalists to promote the responsible reporting of research in the media.
Preprints play a crucial role in open science but offer an opportunity to be gamed. Fictitious authorship in preprints show that open science needs checks and we need to collaborate to govern Open Science.
Preprints make scholarly communication more efficient by disseminating scientific discoveries more rapidly. The measurements presented in this study can help researchers and policymakers make informed decisions about how to effectively use and responsibly embrace a preprint culture.
Study utilised a combination of automatic and manual annotations to quantify how an article from early 2020 changed between the preprinted and published version.
Preprint servers have become an indispensable part of scholarly publishing. The next step is learning how to embrace them.
Cues related to information about open science content and independent verification of author claims were rated as highly important for judging preprint credibility.