web articles

Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Top 16 Research Tools of 2016

Top 16 Research Tools of 2016

A roundup of the top trending online tools of 2016 that were most appreciated and used by the LabWorm community.

Researchers Anxiously Await Trump’s Pick for Science Adviser

Researchers Anxiously Await Trump’s Pick for Science Adviser

Trump’s timing on science jobs not unusual for presidents.

Moneyball for Professors?

Moneyball for Professors?

Using analytics to improve hiring decisions has transformed industries from baseball to investment banking. So why are tenure decisions for professors still made the old-fashioned way?, asks Erik Brynjolfsson from MIT.

The Research Librarian of the Future: Data Scientist and Co-Investigator

The Research Librarian of the Future: Data Scientist and Co-Investigator

How the research librarian of the future might work, utilising new data science and digital skills to drive more collaborative and open scholarship.

Why I Still Won’t Review For or Publish With Elsevier–And Think You Shouldn’t Either

Why I Still Won’t Review For or Publish With Elsevier–And Think You Shouldn’t Either

A list of some of the shady things Elsevier has been previously caught doing

Publishing Better Science through Better Data 2016

Publishing Better Science through Better Data 2016

All the videos and slides from #scidata16.

Comparing Impact Factor and Scopus CiteScore

Comparing Impact Factor and Scopus CiteScore

A preliminary analysis of the new Elsevier's CiteScore journal metric.

Milestones in Tackling Research Reliability, a Timeline

Milestones in Tackling Research Reliability, a Timeline

It’s not a new story, although “the reproducibility crisis” may seem to be. For life sciences, I think it started in the late 1950s. A timeline.

The licensing of bioRxiv preprints

The licensing of bioRxiv preprints

PeerJ offers the better technology and user experience than bioRxiv, but bioRxiv has greater adoption in the biodata sciences.

Honest Mistakes in Research

Honest Mistakes in Research

Times Higher Education is looking at what happens when academics make an honest mistake in their research. Can you take the time to answer four simple questions?You will not be asked to leave your name, email address or any other personal information. We cannot track who has taken part.The survey is completely anonymous, so please answer honestly.