It’s not a new story, although “the reproducibility crisis” may seem to be. For life sciences, I think it started in the late 1950s. A timeline.

PeerJ offers the better technology and user experience than bioRxiv, but bioRxiv has greater adoption in the biodata sciences.

Meet 5 inspiring people—none named Einstein—who helped these scientists find their calling.

Times Higher Education is looking at what happens when academics make an honest mistake in their research. Can you take the time to answer four simple questions?You will not be asked to leave your name, email address or any other personal information. We cannot track who has taken part.The survey is completely anonymous, so please answer honestly.

Getting ready to unveil the 21st “Breakthrough of the Year”...

How Open Data and Open Science are Transforming Biomedical Research

Guest post by Professor Elizabeth Loftus, winner of the 2016 John Maddox Prize

The Association of American Universities worries that the open-access policies federal research agencies are developing now are not sufficiently aligned. Any slowdown in putting them in place, it says, is "probably a positive."

An artificial intelligence system developed by researchers at DeepMind and the University of Oxford got so good by watching 5000 hours of BBC programmes.

PIDapalooza, the first ever festival of persistent identifiers, set out not only to bring together the creators and users of PIDs, but also to make PIDs cool.

A collection of Twitter hashtags about science communication to facilitate engagement with academics and professionals on Twitter.

In the aftermath of the election results, a group of women in the sciences has banded together to speak out against anti-intellectualism, inequality, sexism and discrimination.

Key areas that you’ll need to work on to be an outstanding proposal writer.

UK scientists are coming up with strategies to deal with the prospect of leaving the EU.

National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins talks about the future of the NIH in light of the election.  

Science is going through a revolution. The world of tech, startups, makers, innovators and collaborators are beginning to be welcomed in to the scientific ecosystem in a way never seen before. Science: Disrupt brings together the innovators, iconoclasts and entrepreneurs intent on creating change in science. Join us at Digital Science for our 4th Science Disrupt London Session to Disrupt the Lab!

GitHub is not a solution to the problem of making scripts and software available as part of the permanent record of a publication. But the folk at Zenodo and Mozilla Science Lab (in collaboration with Figshare) have solutions for you now.

The Office of Research Integrity shares a series of infographics addressing the Responsible Conduct of Research and the handling of research misconduct.

In faculty applications, it's important to highlight that you are a good fit for the department and institution. Customizing faculty applications for different departments is well worth the effort.

An animation explaining how genetic technologies work, as well as their possible ethical and societal implications; co-produced by the Royal Society and by the Wellcome Trust.

A collection of tools that might help your research if you adopt them early enough in your academic career.

A dashboard to monitor the evolving landscape of persistent identifiers over the life of the project and beyond.

While offering reviewers any form of guidance is better than none, being thorough and creating a reviewer checklist is by far the best way to help reviewers know the expectations of your journal.

Researchers may publish their best work at any point in their careers, a new study reports. This is not the same as success being the result of random forces or just plain “dumb luck.”

What are your biggest frustrations as a scientist trying to build a research group?

Articles published open access are cited more often than articles that are not. End of Story.

What Open Science means for PLOS.

Program of OpenCon 2016, a platform for the next generation to learn about Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data, develop critical skills, and catalyze action toward a more open system for sharing the world’s information. Held in Washington, DC on November 12-14, 2016.

Explore our data to see the universities, government bodies and pharmaceutical companies that fail to share their clinical trial results.

Tips from Nature Research editors.