Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Real Threat to Trust in Science Isn't Outright Fraud, but the Pervasive Tweaking of Research Designs and Models

The Real Threat to Trust in Science Isn't Outright Fraud, but the Pervasive Tweaking of Research Designs and Models

Science's credibility issues stem from the deliberate manipulation of research designs and model specifications.

Social Scientists Bring Their Faith into Research - And It Shows Up in Their Results

Social Scientists Bring Their Faith into Research - And It Shows Up in Their Results

Why do studies on whether religion is disappearing totally contradict each other? Valeria Rainero, Jörg Stolz and Ruud Luijkx discuss their recent research on how faith (or lack of it) shaped interventions in the secularisation debate and suggest how the social sciences could benefit from less adversarial claims to objectivity in research.

We Need to Move Beyond the Accept/Reject Binary in Peer Review

We Need to Move Beyond the Accept/Reject Binary in Peer Review

Binary reject/accept peer review has become conflated with validation. The authors outline three myths sustaining this confusion and how we might escape it.

Who Deserves the Next Nobel? AI, Genius and Serendipity in Science

Who Deserves the Next Nobel? AI, Genius and Serendipity in Science

AI is increasingly becoming a part of Nobel winning science, how is this reshaping serendipity and what it means to make a scientific breakthrough?

The Unethical Burden of Public Engagement and the "Alt-output" Problem

The Unethical Burden of Public Engagement and the "Alt-output" Problem

Photo essays, podcasts, and other 'impactful' outputs are on the rise. While funders cheer innovation and community engagement, communities in crisis settings feel over-researched and under-served.

Even Honest Research Results Can Flip - a New Approach to Assessing Robustness in the Social Sciences

Even Honest Research Results Can Flip - a New Approach to Assessing Robustness in the Social Sciences

When academic studies get things wrong, it is often blamed on misconduct. Yet even good-faith research can produce contradictory conclusions.

Why Restrictive Academic Authorship Practices Perpetuate Inequality

Why Restrictive Academic Authorship Practices Perpetuate Inequality

Authorship plays a central role in the credibility and career progression of academics. Yet as Joseph Mellors and Stroma Cole argue, restrictive authorship practices risk perpetuating inequalities and sidelining important contributions to knowledge.

Why We Should Foster Connection and Belonging in Neo-liberal Academia

Why We Should Foster Connection and Belonging in Neo-liberal Academia

In a system where academic success is defined by outputs and individual achievement, Rachael Hains-Wesson and Nira Rahman call for a shift towards connection and belonging. 

 

 

 

European Big Science Has the Potential to Drive Social and Economic Transformation

European Big Science Has the Potential to Drive Social and Economic Transformation

Investment in Big Science projects, such as the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, are often seen as purely scientific ventures. A more co-ordinated approach to Big Science across the UK and European Union could produce significant benefits.

Case Studies Are Vital to Monitoring the Development of Open Science

Case Studies Are Vital to Monitoring the Development of Open Science

As a recent consultation on how to monitor open science practices draws to a close, it is argued that if monitoring frameworks aim to capture the widest dimensions of open science as a practice they should include case studies.

Open Research Data Poses Real World Risks That Need to Be Managed

Open Research Data Poses Real World Risks That Need to Be Managed

A recent work  outlines seven kinds of research data misuse and provide recommendations.

Preprints at a Crossroads - Are We Compromising Openness for Credibility?

Preprints at a Crossroads - Are We Compromising Openness for Credibility?

Bringing together a range of studies into various aspects of how preprints interact with the wider information ecosystem, Natascha Chtena, Juan Pablo Alperin, and Alice Fleerackers argue that the speed, accessibility and low barriers to entry that preprints offer to scholarly communication risk being undermined by attempts to make them more aligned to traditional academic publications.

An Academic Great Gatsby Curve - How Much Academic Success Inherited?

An Academic Great Gatsby Curve - How Much Academic Success Inherited?

To what extent does academic success follow success? The dynamics of citation and wealth inequality may be surprisingly similar.

If Generative AI Accelerates Science, Peer Review Needs to Catch Up

If Generative AI Accelerates Science, Peer Review Needs to Catch Up

Studies have increasingly shown the widespread use of generative AI in research publications. Faced with the consequent uptick in the number of publications, Simone Ragavooloo argues that editors and reviewers should embrace AI tools to undertake the heavy lifting of statistical and methodological review and to allow them to focus on areas that require human expertise.