How much should scientists check other scientists' work?
A debate is growing in the research world over the value of replicating older, peer-reviewed studies.
Send us a link
Many hands make tight work
Crowdsourcing research can balance discussions, validate findings and better inform policy.
Advancing postdoc women guidebook
You may not have the time or interest to read the guidebook’s full 85 pages, but it’s a great compilation of resources that can be a valuable compass as you navigate the sometimes turbulent waters of a postdoctoral fellowship.
400+ tools and innovations in scholarly communication
This is a shared database that grew out of the "101 innovations in scholarly communication" project.
Altmetric for ORCID bookmarklet
This application let you see the Altmetric Score metrics of works on your browser when you click the bookmarklet in ORCID Record pages.
Nobel laureates who were not always noble
Racists, frauds, and misogynists: meet the rogues’ gallery of Nobel Prize winners.
Are more retractions due to more scrutiny?
The question has actually been addressed in the scientific literature and the data don’t seem to support this assumption.
What's so wrong with the Impact Factor?
Once a paper has its perceived value raised by being cited, it’s likely to get cited again.
Initiative helps match refugees with science jobs
A new program will connect researchers with universities but won't give them preferential treatment.
Cardiologist to head extramural research at NIH
Michael Lauer, who has been with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute since 2007, will become NIH deputy director for extramural research in a few weeks.
Is the 2015 Nobel Prize a turning point for traditional Chinese medicine?
The 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has gone to a researcher who spent her entire career researching traditional Chinese medicine...
The folly of big science awards
Major awards honor the scientists who are usually in the least need of recognition and funding, which squeezes out opportunities for other scientists.
How scientists fool themselves and how they can stop
Humans are remarkably good at self-deception. But growing concern about reproducibility is driving many researchers to seek ways to fight their own worst instincts.
Homo naledi fossil discovery a triumph for open access and education
The lead paper describing Homo naledi has been viewed more than 170,000 times in one week.
New ways of publishing research in the digital age
A massive increase in the power of digital technology over the past decade allows us today to publish any article, blog post or tweet in a matter of seconds.
Much more than just genetics
Much more than just genetics
Is "Precision Medicine" another case of rebranding, as chemistry has morphed into nanotech?
Does the peer review model affect the quality of peer review?
BMC editors show that the quality of peer review is slightly higher in BMC Infectious Diseases that operates open peer review compared to BMC Microbiology operating single-blind peer review.
Optimizing the nation's investment in academic research
A new regulatory framework for the 21st century.
Making open science a reality
A OECD Report on the benefits and the action required to make open science a reality.
OLH Launches
The Open Library of Humanities launches with seven journals and the support of 99 institutions.
Global competitiveness report 2015-2016
Switzerland named world’s most competitive economy, again, for the seventh year in a row.
Precision Medicine Initiative moves forward
The NIH Advisory Committee to the Director issued recommendations laying out a blueprint for the Obama Administration's precision medicine initiative, including the framework for building a large-scale, national research cohort of 1 million or more Americans.
Socientize as e-infrastructure through technology, innovation and creativity
Citizen science is an innovative concept to involve the general public in scientific processes.
Putting credit back into the hands of researchers
GigaScience launched a project providing an alternative way to give authors credit for their work, contributing more to collaboration, transparency and better data.
The Open Scholarship Initiative: the future of global scholarly publishing
A 10-year series of annual meetings where high-level stakeholder representatives work together to improve the future of how research information gets published, shared and accessed.
Crossref to Auto-Update ORCID Records
Authors with an ORCID iD will be able to have Crossref automatically push information about their published work to their ORCID record.
Equality: we are definitely not there yet
The League of European Research Universities calls for leadership on gender equality issues.
×