It’s time for positive action on negative results
Perspectives: Structural biologist suggests that chemists can help redefine good research behavior by telling the whole story
Send us a link
Perspectives: Structural biologist suggests that chemists can help redefine good research behavior by telling the whole story
Researchers, publishers and representatives of funding agencies gathered at ASAPBio to discuss the use of preprint publications in biology. It became clear through the discussion on Twitter with #ASAPBio that many were unclear as to the purpose of the meeting, how preprints could help or hinder junior scientists, or even what preprints are.
Why does the impact factor continue to play such a consequential role in academia? Alex Rushforth and Sarah de Rijcke look at how considerations of the metric enter in from early stages of research…
Tianhui Michael Li and Allison Bishop write about the overemphasis on calculus in high school and college math courses. Statistics, linear algebra and algorithmic thinking are more valuable in the digital age.
New Chinese 5-year plan promises 2.5% R&D:GDP ratio by 2020, up from 2.05% in 2014.
How do retractions influence the scholarly impact of retracted papers, authors, and institutions; and how does this influence propagate to the wider academic community through scholarly associations?
Jisc Digifest hears openness could bring benefits, but some cite plagiarism risks
Limited institutional resources mean that single parents often need a network of support to further their scientific careers.
The Royal Society’s new campaign highlights the importance of life outside the laboratory
Is science quite as scientific as it's supposed to be? After years of covering science in the news, Alok Jha began to wonder whether science is as rigorous as it should be.
An influential psychological theory, borne out in hundreds of experiments, may have just been debunked. How can so many scientists have been so wrong?
A look at the PLoS ONE paper on a hand designed by “the Creator”
New startups like this one are trying to disrupt traditional academic publishing.
The psychology establishment is fighting back against an attack on its reliability. But it might be letting emotion get in the way.
Compared with psychology, the replication rate "is rather good," researchers say
Reanalysis of last year's enormous replication study argues that there is no need to be so pessimistic.
Apparently creationist research prompts soul searching over process of editing and peer review.
Times Higher Education World University Rankings data reveal the 20 best institutions based on private-sector investment per academic
Universities need to expand international engagement to remain competitive, according to a report by Digital Science.
Female researchers now account for 37 per cent of first authors in medicine’s top journals, says US study
Observational study from 1994 to 2014
Researchers on social media ask at what point replication efforts go from useful to wasteful.
A peer-to-peer website aims to disrupt the author-services industry.
To engage the public in your work, whilst also solving that all-important research funding problem?
Recently, some have begun to explore the utilization of the crowd for various purposes in medical research, including fundraising as well as crowdsourcing for intellectual analyses and insights.