The scientific impact of Brexit: it's complicated
Is UK science better off in or out of the EU? The arguments are complex and only partially evidence-based. And that’s not surprising.
Send us a link
Is UK science better off in or out of the EU? The arguments are complex and only partially evidence-based. And that’s not surprising.
Elite scientists generally agree on what character traits make for excellent science.
Speech by Commissioner Carlos Moedas in Amsterdam, NL
Now that most major research funders require researchers to make their outputs available in open access (OA), new developments in the field are coming faster than ever.
A professional body for UK social scientists can help to improve research practice — and not just in public engagement, says Andrew Webster.
The days of open science have arrived and it is time to move from pay-to-read to free-to-read, says EU's R&D Commissioner. But publishers want to keep their subscriptions.
Two high-profile cases in which universities — who by US law are the ones that must open an investigation into misconduct — stonewalled the effort.
Do people think that scientists are bad people? Although surveys find that science is a highly respected profession, a growing discourse has emerged regarding how science is often judged negatively.
Meet accused hacker and copyright infringer Alexandra Elbakyan.
By fetishising mathematical models, economists turned economics into a highly paid pseudoscience
The authors of a new book challenge what they call the “frantic pace” of contemporary university life.
This advisory report is about open science, and more specifically about access to scholarly publications (open access) and research data (open research data). What impact is this likely to have for the world of science itself, for society and for business? What level of openness is publicly desirable and what does this imply for government policy?
Characteristics of images and perceptions of professionalism and attractiveness on academic social networking sites
On the democratization of science via the Internet and the dramatic change in the communication of data and in their interpretation.
After a series of scandals in Nordic science, Denmark and Sweden are rethinking how they investigate allegations of academic fraud and misconduct.
Financial conflicts of interest … Concerns about a people-based funding program … NextGen VOICES … A scientific memoir … Working Life
Researchers are learning how to convert devices into global laboratories.
Scientific misconduct increasingly studied as example of ‘occupational crime’, researcher says.
An Australian neuroscientist just pleaded guilty to fraud but received a suspended sentence for his research misconduct.
Authors have, in general, a positive view on open access, but other factors are more important in choosing a place of publication for an academic article.
Researchers drop in. They take specimens. And they head home and don't share. That's no way to fight an epidemic. Can they do things differently when it comes to Zika?
After many and long conversations among colleagues within and beyond the Scholarly Kitchen about what researchers need to know about scholarly publishing.
Human Brain Project asks wider neuroscience community to start using its hardware and software.
Youth is not a bar to excellence, despite older institutions’ rankings success. Jack Grove analyses how some youthful contenders have risen in the ranks.
Springer is launching a new online initiative called Change the World, One Article at a Time: Must-Read Articles from 2015. The initiative focuses on articles published in 2015 in Springer journals which deal with some of the world's most urgent challenges. Those articles which are already open access are freely available online on a permanent basis and all other articles have been made freely available until July 15, 2016.