The pressure to publish pushes down quality
Scientists must publish less, or good research will be swamped by the ever-increasing volume of poor work.
Send us a link
Scientists must publish less, or good research will be swamped by the ever-increasing volume of poor work.
Top speakers announced at the next EuroScience Open Forum 2016, held in Manchester this summer (July 24-27).
Document submitted to the Italian Senate criticizes institute that will oversee a €1.5-billion project.
Open competitions bring new minds, skills and collaborations to problems in biomedical research.
Female Ph.D.s in science and engineering earn 31 percent less than their male cohorts one year after graduation, according to a new study in American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings. When controlling for the fact that women tend to earn degrees in fields that pay less than those in which more men earn degrees, the observed gap dropped to 11 percent. And the gap disappeared when controlling for whether the women were married and had children.
Drug researcher David Nutt discusses brain-imaging studies with hallucinogens and how he needed to crowdfund the resources to analyse the data.
A comparison of the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals.
JournalReviewer is an independent site that aggregates information users provide about their experience with academic journals' review processes.
The open source physics site arXiv is turning 25, and it's going to get a makeover. But what does that mean for its principles of data transparency?
What do the world’s six most reputed universities have in common?
Women only got top billing in 37 percent of medical studies published in leading journals over the past two decades.
Notes on Open Science from the Barcamp Science 2.0 and the Science 2.0 Conference.
John Oliver discusses how and why media outlets so often report untrue or incomplete information as science.
The seven excuses for not doing so are all invalid.
An opinon on the article "Merck Wants Its Money Back if University Research Is Wrong"
Today the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) will remove approximately 3300 journals for failure to submit a valid reapplication before the communicated deadline.
Team finalists receive $80,000 each to develop products to overcome hurdles in big data access and usage.
Science "deserves better than to be twisted out of proportion and turned into morning show gossip."
Interview with Daniel Lakens, Assistant Professor in Applied Cognitive Psychology at the Eindhoven University of Technology
How can interdisciplinary research proposals be more effectively assessed through peer review?
Royal Society's President, Sir Venki Ramakrishnan, on the key principles to guide the future of UK's research.
The current incentives structure — mostly based on publishing in prestigious journals — discourages sharing, replication, and, some argue, careful science.
A study released on Thursday found that many Ph.D. students pursue post-docs as a “default” option after graduate school, or as part of a “holding pattern” until the job they want is available.
Complex, diverse rationales require nuanced policies: evidence suggests a need for increased attention to career planning among students, their mentors, graduate schools, and funders
Survey responses reveal that beyond lack of journal access, convenience and antipathy toward publishers are key motivations for turning to paper repository