Bad Blood about CRISPR
Who gets credit for the technology to cut-and-paste the human genome?
Send us a link
Who gets credit for the technology to cut-and-paste the human genome?
University of Oxford snatches top spot from Caltech in this year’s World University Rankings as Asia’s rise continues.
Worries include how to coordinate research programmes and resources from different countries.
Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan plan to invest $3bn over next decade to help scientists develop and utilise tools such as artificial intelligence and blood monitors to treat illnesses
A torrent of low-quality meta-analyses and systematic reviews in biomedicine might be hiding valuable research and misleading scientists.
Scientists incentivised to publish surprising results frequently in major journals, despite risk that such findings are likely to be wrong, suggests research.
New study adds to evidence that student reviews of professors have limited validity.
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative aims to have major impact by 2100.
Poor research design and data analysis encourage false-positive findings. Such poor methods persist despite perennial calls for improvement, suggesting that they result from something more than just misunderstanding.
Around the world, poverty and social background remain huge barriers in scientific careers.
With a focus on deep reporting, a print magazine, and an intense affinity for illustrations, nonprofit Nautilus has taken an expensive approach to launching a new science publication.
New program aims to recruit and retain early-career scientists who are from gender, racial, ethnic, and other groups underrepresented in the life sciences, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Federally funded research will now come with an open access clause – but uncertainties remain
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is suing predatory journal publishing company, OMICS Group, for hiding fees and deceiving researchers. It's a first for the largely unregulated industry.
ScienceOpen has teamed up with OpenAIRE and Digital-Science, alongside two of their portfolio companies – Figshare and Overleaf, to organise an OpenCon ‘satellite’ event to be held in Berlin on the 24-26th November.
Peer reviews created by self-generated text machines are the latest threat to scientific integrity.
Anonymous individual or group claims that 22 papers from the University of Tokyo contain fabricated or falsified data.
Organizers of national neuroscience projects meet to coordinate goals.
The move to providing the underlying data behind research articles has been a major step towards promoting reproducibility, transparency and data re-use. However, analyses of the quality and annota…
As we celebrate Peer Review Week, this post summarizes some of the reviewer preferences along with ways to boost recognition for peer review activities.
The relatively new exception to copyright law that we enjoy in the UK, permitting text and data mining (TDM) for the purposes of non-commercial research, offers potential to further knowledge and make scientific and medical breakthroughs.
We can all recognise the ambitious researcher at the conference who is anxious to advertise their own work. It resonates with my current work on academic self-promotion via university profile pages. And I start to wonder, is a new academic habitus beginning to emerge?
We don't know what knowledge we'll need in the future, and that's where maths research comes in.
Science is a public good and deserves to be valued more highly and used effectively by decision-makers at all levels.
As a researcher who gets such severe criticism, you have to go through the 5 stages of grief...
An interview with Tom Culley, Marketing Director of Publons, on how provide recognition for this vital part of the scientific process.
It’s the most wondrous time of the year! Peer Review Week is the time when the scholarly communications community comes together to recognise the importance and value of peer review and peer review…
Researchers will have to publicly report the results of many more clinical trials under new government rules announced Friday.
The tension between simple but invalid indicators that are widely used and more sophisticated indicators that are not used or cannot be used in evaluation practices because they are not transparent for users, cannot be calculated, or are difficult to interpret.