The Gender Bias in Peer Reviewing Reveals the Sexism in Academia
Even women researchers are more likely to choose men to review their academic papers.
Send us a link
Even women researchers are more likely to choose men to review their academic papers.
Are we leaving behind the age of statistics, and entering a new age of big data controlled by private companies?
How do you know where to publish your research? Can you be sure the publisher you submit to is reputable? Read our guidance on what to look for.
In a time when facts don’t matter, and science is being muzzled, American democracy is the real victim
This viewpoint proposes using a sharing index or S-index to measure investigators’ engagement in sharing research data.
The Trump administration has imposed a freeze on grants and contracts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. scientists wait anxiously for the new administration to flesh out its policies.
The 2017 Innovative Seed Grant Program is accepting proposals for interdisciplinary ventures on the CU Boulder campus, due Feb. 12. The program has set aside $1 million to fund grants of up to $50,000 each.
Discussing the Future of Academic Publishing.
Academic life is particularly full of rank ordered lists, even if they are frequently not transparently available.
Meta.ai is joining the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
He also immediately suspended all Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracts and grants.
Do popular science articles make the public overconfident about their own expertise?
For those interested in knowing what is in the world around them, the current news is disgusting. All US Environmental Protection Agency grants have been frozen, and employees are being prohibited from discussing the changes or talking to the public.
As privatized platforms like Academia.edu look to monetize scholarly writing even further, researchers, scientists and academics across the globe must now consider alternatives to proprietary companies that aim to profit from our writing and offer little transparency as to how our work will be used in the future.
Does that mean the original research was wrong? No. It means science is really, really hard.
Open-science advocate says journals should be clearer to peer-reviewers about terms and conditions.
Meet the former Enron trader and hedge fund founder who's on a quest to expose bad science.
Please cosign the statement below if you think the NIH should give scientists the option of using preprints as evidence of productivity in grant applications, following the recent policies of the Wellcome Trust, MRC, HFSP, Simons Foundation, and Helmsley Foundation.
Scientists ponder functionality of open science approach in the wake of Tanenbaum Open Science Institute announcement
Vaccines work, climate change is real — and scientists’ tweets for the Trump administration.
Letter from the Dutch State Secretary for Education, Culture and Science informing the House of Representatives of the progress made in the field of open science.