The Mystery of the Phantom Reference: A Detective Story
Short summary of white paper that shows how sloppy writing and sloppy quality control lead to a non-existing article being cited nearly 400 times.
Send us a link
Short summary of white paper that shows how sloppy writing and sloppy quality control lead to a non-existing article being cited nearly 400 times.
A clear citation advantage for open publishing with open available documents receiving twice as many citations.
The world’s most important research is inaccessible from the majority of the world.
An easy to apply, universally comparable and fair metric to measure and report co-authors contribution in the scientific literature.
Metrics are notoriously inappropriate for evaluating humanistic scholarship. HumetricsHSS is an initiative to embed metrics with humanistic values.
Scholarly profile pages constructed from queries to information in Wikidata.
Open-access publishing held to the same standards as paid subscription journals.
This article provides a quantitative analysis of peer review as an emerging field of research by revealing patterns and connections between authors, fields and journals from 1950 to 2016.
Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID.
A bibliometric analysis of citers.
The academic social network site ResearchGate (RG) has its own indicator, RG Score, for its members. The high profile nature of the site means that the RG Score may be used for recruitment, promotion
An analysis of a popular reputation metric concludes it relies too heavily on social interaction.
Self-citations and academic assessments: Including the s-index as an additional metric thus provides important context to guide decisions based on academic value.
As the h-index becomes the standard for measuring researcher impact, the risk for gaming the system grows.
New metric measures how reliable scientific claims turn out to be – but calculating it could be an enormous task.
No generalizable gold OA citation advantage at journal level.