The scientific impact of Brexit: it's complicated
Is UK science better off in or out of the EU? The arguments are complex and only partially evidence-based. And that’s not surprising.
Send us a link
Is UK science better off in or out of the EU? The arguments are complex and only partially evidence-based. And that’s not surprising.
This week’s budget contained the usual announcements about new research facilities. But behind the welcome news, concerns continue to mount
Colette Bourlier, who awarded a high distinction for her thesis on immigrant workers, said it took so long because she ‘took breaks’.
Training a computer to play Go is an impressive achievement, but AlphaGo may be a long way from being a useful product.
The Royal Society’s new campaign highlights the importance of life outside the laboratory
Two recent programmes on BBC Radio 4 highlight a worrying anti-democratic bias in discussions of science and technology.
When presenting evidence to policymakers, scientists and other experts need to engage with the policy process that exists, not the one we wish existed.
New rules could stop state-funded scientists advising ministers and make it easier for companies and campaign groups to sway government decisions
Only one in 20 black South Africans succeeds in higher education, and more than half who enrol at university drop out before completing their degree, according to research published this week.
The gravitational waves theorist saw physics as no one else did, but if he was around today his time would be spent chasing grants or tenures.
Moves to speed up the release of Zika virus research in response to the public health crisis highlight a systemic failure in scientific publishing.
A new initiative published this week outlines how scientists can make a change to open science practices at an individual level.
Researchers are urged to make their work accessible, but simplifying complex ideas doesn’t support great scholarship.
The Eurosceptics say universities would be unaffected, or even improved, by a Brexit. They are wrong, says this vice-chancellor.
Biomedical research has faced criticism for being unreliable, but a report from the Academy of Medical Sciences might change all that.
There are just 79 scientists per million Africans, compared to 4,500 per million people in the United States.
A new book argues for less focus on structures and funding for interdisciplinarity, and more on the everyday highs and lows of collaboration.
University that gave shelter to Einstein quietly opens its doors to Syrian refugees.
The bullet 'pointization' of information is making us stupid and irresponsible.
A new survey from L’Oreal looks at the public’s perception of female scientists with shocking results. (Particularly if you live in China.)
Change in methodology beneficial to ETHZ and EPFL.
In the US, taxpayers are said to be spending $139bn a year on research, and in the UK, £4.7bn. Too much of that money is disappearing into big pockets.
Peer review is often claimed to be the guarantor of the trustworthiness of scientific papers, but it is a troubled process. Preprints offer a way out.
My team is drawn from all over Europe and beyond – the researchers bring in talent, income and dedication.
A Brexit would put the UK’s academic success at risk as European research stars go elsewhere.
Academics are challenging the control of a select group of publishing houses over scientific journals.
[21]New analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration across the UK research landscape highlights important questions about how we organise, fund and assess research.
Consultants think they can make publicly funded research more efficient. But they’re in danger of ignoring existing analyses – and real-life experience.