British universities slip downing global rankings
Change in methodology beneficial to ETHZ and EPFL.
Send us a link
Change in methodology beneficial to ETHZ and EPFL.
In the US, taxpayers are said to be spending $139bn a year on research, and in the UK, £4.7bn. Too much of that money is disappearing into big pockets.
Peer review is often claimed to be the guarantor of the trustworthiness of scientific papers, but it is a troubled process. Preprints offer a way out.
My team is drawn from all over Europe and beyond – the researchers bring in talent, income and dedication.
A Brexit would put the UK’s academic success at risk as European research stars go elsewhere.
Academics are challenging the control of a select group of publishing houses over scientific journals.
[21]New analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration across the UK research landscape highlights important questions about how we organise, fund and assess research.
Consultants think they can make publicly funded research more efficient. But they’re in danger of ignoring existing analyses – and real-life experience.
In the UK, in 2014, 46% of research grants awarded included non-academic partners, up from 38% the year before.
Metrics play a growing role in managing research. But to understand their limitations, we need to draw on the humanities.
The National Institute of General Medical Sciences at the NIH has come up with a new system for funding researchers. Will the new Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award prove beneficial?
Science posted the most comprehensive [3]guidelines for the publication of studies in basic science to date, calling for the adoption of clearly defined rules on the sharing of data and methods.
What lessons does the Swiss ambivalence towards European Union hold for the UK?
"The right to read is the right to mine" : publishers are resisting a change to copyright law that would allow academics to digitally mine published research to help crack intractable problems.
There is an urgent need to reverse the decline in research funding, and a lot to discuss about how decisions are made. But setting up a death match between Big Science and the rest is not the way to go.
As science money is increasingly awarded to a small number of expensive projects, some academics argue that a new funding system is needed.
Has the traditional format of the science journal had its day? Dorothy Bishop outlines an alternative model, based on consensual communication.
The possibility the UK will vote to leave the EU would be a disaster for British science.
There’s no doubt political parties listen to think tanks. Using them to present academic work could help researchers penetrate the Westminster bubble.
Writing and reviewing journal articles is part of the core business of a scientist. But it’s not an efficient way to communicate research results.
The same organisations that make it difficult to get a grant can be ridiculously laid back about how their money is spent once they have signed it over.
Things are improving for women working in most STEM-based fields, although there are some notable exceptions.
Free from bureaucracy, independent science labs offer a flexibility that can't be matched by universities.
Giving equal weight to everybody’s opinion might be the worse thing you could do.
A new report suggests more sharing of research equipment may be a better way of getting more bang out of the science funding buck than clawing back ‘efficiency savings’ out of grant funding.
Negative findings matter too and new OA publications are helping researchers to give a fuller account of themselves.
Facilities prepare for shutdown as government refuses to secure funding. Up to 1,700 jobs at 27 facilities at risk from 30 June, with $150m in vital funding tied to the Coalition’s higher-education changes.
The PDF makes reading science research even more difficult and prevents a two-way conversation from taking place.
Anne Glover, former chief scientific adviser to the president of the European commission, gives a frank account of the highs and lows of her three years in Brussels.
History shows us that social scientists are essential if we are to get the most out of our engineering and technological innovations.