Knowledge Lab project to investigate programming features and data science environments.

Organization and presentation of visual information in the scientific literature.

Is your resolution for the new academic year to publish more? Here, 16 scholars give advice on pitching, editing and writing – and dealing with negative peer reviews.

After almost 25 years since Stevan Harnad’s “subversive proposal“, now, finally, scholars and the public have a range of avenues at their disposal to access nearly every scholarly article.

Why is the one federal agency dedicated to revealing the unknown to humankind so difficult for many journalists to penetrate?

As research and editorial processes become increasingly open, scientists and editors need to be proactive but also alert to risks.

I was reminded today about the wonderful history of Nature in it's claim that it would make all papers reporting a new genome sequence freely and openly available.

The perceived and actual barriers experienced by researchers attempting to do reproducible research.

After almost two decades, these developments give hope that scholarly articles will finally be freed from their paywalls.

They’re a part of every career, and being upfront about them can help put things in perspective.

The strengths and weaknesses of arXiv in an effort to identify what possible improvements can be made based on new technologies not previously available.

Earlier this week, eLife announced a partnership with Coko to build an open source solution for submission, peer review and processing of manuscripts. The limitations of the currently available systems are substantial.

The Open APC initiative releases datasets on fees paid for Open Access journal articles by universities and research institutions under an Open Database License.

Self-citations and academic assessments: Including the s-index as an additional metric thus provides important context to guide decisions based on academic value.

On perversity in academic rewards

The goal is to deliver an open-source submission and peer-review platform

Congratulations to Irene Hames, the winner of Publons' inaugural Sentinel Award - for outstanding advocacy, innovation or contribution to scholarly peer review.

Here's a brief summary of some key takeaways from this year's Peer Review Congress, held every four years. A talk by the Swiss National Science Foundation was especially enjoyed.

Transparency in Review, and other innovations - Research in progress blog

What kind of peer review is developing to evaluate long-form digital scholarship? A view from AAUP press editors.

With science needing to always be reviewed to be sure it is correct, using Post-publication peer review is useful for scientific accuracy.

These tips will help you maximize your productivity.

Words of Wisdom from Those Who Publish (and Do Not Perish).

A novel text-mining strategy that identifies articles producing biological data. 

Like many others in the scholarly community, we were very disappointed to learn about the recent acquisition by Elsevier of bepress, the provider of the popular Digital Commons repository platform.

We-Sci: a collaborative research network for computational and traditional biologists.

If you have a pressing need to read an academic paper that’s hiding behind a paywall, your quickest course of action may well be to use Sci-Hub.

With Substance and Stencila, eLife is developing the technology required to publish computationally reproducible research articles online.

Transparency is back in vogue.

Find out how Pure is giving the Research Council of Norway access to a global pool of experts for its wide variety of projects.