It's Time to Retire Statistical Significance
While statistical significance sends the so-called significant results into the literature, the results on the other side of the threshold often disappear into the “famous file drawer”.
web articles
Send us a link
While statistical significance sends the so-called significant results into the literature, the results on the other side of the threshold often disappear into the “famous file drawer”.
A North American framework for creating transformative change in the scholarly publishing industry based on initial insights from the University of California's 2018-19 negotiations with Elsevier.
Just as patients' access to journals is important,so is the access of doctors in developing countries.
University libraries around the world are seeing precipitous declines in the use of the books on their shelves.
The region already hosts some of the world's leading scientific countries, and some of its smaller states are quickly catching up.
Atomic Age would mark the start of the current geologic time unit, if proposal receives final approval.
On the eve of the European Union's parliamentary elections, a special issue examines the prospects for science across the region.
Frequent rejection and a loss of control are making university staff isolated and ill, new research shows
Nature asked nine leading Europeans to pick their top priority for science at this pivotal point. Love, money, and trust got the most votes.
Published peer review is now an available option for all PLOS journal submissions.
We need to let non-scientists know that science isn't based on "proof," but rather on the practice of testing and checking one another's work.
Gran Sasso lab plans to shut down two of its large experiments in 2020.
Wie die Innovationsförderung des Bundes in ein bürokratisches Ungetüm verwandelt wurde.
Former EuroScience Secretary General Peter Tindemans, argues that it is good news that the European Parliament and European Council have reached a partial agreement on the contours of Horizon Europe, the next EU R&D programme.
I attended csv,conf,v4 in Portland, Oregon in May 2019. Here are a few reflections about the conference and a bit about my talk where I shared progress from the Openscapes Champions.
The Series of Unsurprising Results in Economics (SURE) is an e-journal of high-quality research with "unsurprising" findings. We publish scientifically important and carefully-executed studies with statistically insignificant or otherwise unsurprising results. Studies from all fields of Economics will be considered. SURE is an open-access journal and there are no submission charges. SURE benefits readers by: Mitigating the … Continue reading Aim and Scope →
Registered Reports emphasize the importance of the research question and the quality of methodology by conducting peer review prior to data collection. High quality protocols are then provisionally accepted for publication if the authors follow through with the registered methodology.
New International Research and Innovation Strategy launched to ensure the UK remains a global leader in science.
The first international meeting on postgraduate mental health was an important step, but much more is needed to solve academia's crisis.
Countries in southeast Asia, Africa and South America lead the way on free-to-read literature.
The country's major funding agency says the tool reduces the time it takes to find referees.
Expert advice on how to prepare a perfect funding application
"Today I speak to you of war. A war that has pitted statistician against statistician for nearly 100 years. A mathematical conflict that has recently come to the attention of the ‘normal’ people."
At PLOS ONE we like to speed up the publication process wherever we can. We like science to be out in the open, and publication of peer-reviewed research to take place without undue delays, so that others can use and build upon the findings. Aligned with our founding mission, we aim to be as fast as we can while remaining true to our publication criteria and without compromising the quality of the peer review process.