Troubled from the start
Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated.
opinion articles
Send us a link
Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated.
There’s a replication crisis in biomedicine—and no one even knows how deep it runs.
Saying that Sci-Hub is about copyright infringement is like saying the Boston Tea Party was about late-night vandalism.
The UK’s higher education institutions spend more than £180m on journal subscriptions every year. We need to come together and create a better system
As the White House prepares for its annual science fair, it's worth remembering that these events leave some children behind.
The rationale is simple: More anonymity means more scrutiny for published papers, and more scrutiny means more errors are caught.
And how to fix them. By Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus.
Scientific journal policies, physics' head start with arXiv, and differences in the culture of the two disciplines may all play a role.
As Silicon Valley fights for talent, universities struggle to hold on to their stars
Although there has been a welcome increase in discussion about gender disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), broad participation of women from all backgrounds in academic STEM will not be achieved until institutions are transformed.
Control, surveillance and thought manipulation: there is an undercurrent of 1984 in today’s academy, doublethinks Eric Blair
The advantages of making scientific data available for further analysis are clear, but it could also enable the trawling of data to find significant, or preferred, results.
Two high-profile cases in which universities — who by US law are the ones that must open an investigation into misconduct — stonewalled the effort.
A. Hope Jahren on women, research, and life in the lab.
By fetishising mathematical models, economists turned economics into a highly paid pseudoscience
Elite scientists generally agree on what character traits make for excellent science.
David Matthews examines the approach of ResearchGate, Academia.edu and Mendeley to profit, user data and open access publishing
Is UK science better off in or out of the EU? The arguments are complex and only partially evidence-based. And that’s not surprising.
Content piracy may be illegal, but price gouging is at least as despicable.
A professional body for UK social scientists can help to improve research practice — and not just in public engagement, says Andrew Webster.
Researchers drop in. They take specimens. And they head home and don't share. That's no way to fight an epidemic. Can they do things differently when it comes to Zika?
Youth is not a bar to excellence, despite older institutions’ rankings success. Jack Grove analyses how some youthful contenders have risen in the ranks.
Interview with Ijad Madisch, co-founder and CEO of the world’s largest online network for scientists
Disruptive innovation has to be accompanied by social and cultural progress.
When physicists and mathematicians venture into the social sciences, new discoveries await — but a lot of bickering and mistrust must be overcome first.
Early attempts to tailor disease treatment to individuals based on their DNA have met with equivocal success, raising concerns about a push to scale up such efforts.