Bob Dylan Won. But in Science, the Times They Aren’t A-Changin’
When I first heard that Bob Dylan had won the Nobel Prize in Literature, I was immediately jealous of the scientists who had won this year.
opinion articles
Send us a link
When I first heard that Bob Dylan had won the Nobel Prize in Literature, I was immediately jealous of the scientists who had won this year.
Peer review publications remain a key stage in the quality assurance of new research, but some comments can be the stuff of nightmares.
Research used to be about the pursuit of knowledge, now it’s driven by impact and returns. The only way to survive is to change how we work
Interview with Rusty Speidel, Marketing Director at the Center for Open Science (COS).
Demand for steady output stymies discovery. To pursue the most important research, scientists must be allowed to shift their focus.
What Francis Crick and Sydney Brenner taught me about being scooped, by Bob Goldstein
Lynn Kamerlin makes a point of supporting her trainees' career aspirations, whatever they may be
These days, a scientist has to publish a steady stream of research articles to be “successful.” But two new studies argue that that kind of pressure promotes sloppy science at the expense of careful work.
Taking potshots at some scientific research is a pastime of American politics. But critics need to assess the merits of the research they target beforehand.
Scientific American evaluates responses from Clinton, Trump, Johnson and Stein to 20 questions
To stop evidence-based policy losing its clout, researchers need to engage with policymakers and understand their needs, says Bill Colglazier.
A career in research development can offer a way for scientists to stay connected to research while also leveraging their soft skills
Speech by EU Commissioner C. Moedas at the Frankfurt Book Fair
The Ref star system encourages novelty but offers no incentive to replicate studies – and that’s exactly what scientists need to do to be more sure of our claims.
Artificial intelligence is everywhere. But before scientists trust it, they first need to understand how machines learn.
Philosophers could help policy makers to ask the right questions. But to give this practical help, academic philosophy must take lessons from open science.
Long-term basic research, substantially funded by the U.S. government, underlies some of industry's most profitable innovations.
If you’re not willing to communicate your research, you shouldn’t be doing it, says Anne Glover.
We need both neuroscience and clinical research.
The need to teach both music theory and string theory is a necessity for the economy to continue as the preeminent leader in technological innovation.
Top scientists spar over reforms that would create research funding behemoth.
Despite a growing number of female political leaders across the globe, women are still in a minority when it comes to positions of power in world politics.
Academic psychology and medical testing are both dogged by unreliability. The reason is clear: we got probability wrong.