Presenting science as a battle for truth against ignorance is an unhelpful exaggeration.

Without data on how artificial intelligence is affecting jobs, policymakers will fly blind into the next industrial revolution, warn Tom Mitchell and Erik Brynjolfsson.

We suggest a centralized facility for submitting to journals—one that would benefit scientists and not only publishers.

The STM Association Future Labs Committee explores the technology trends that will impact scholarly publishing by 2021.

Although automated publishing would allow researchers to share their findings faster, while also removing human bias, there are obvious ethical dilemmas related to this dehumanisation of the process.

Privacy has not always been seen as an asset.

As technology renders jobs obsolete, what will keep us busy? Sapiens author Yuval Noah Harari examines ‘the useless class’ and a new quest for purpose

Rapid developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning have enabled scientific racism to enter a new era, in which machine-learned models embed biases present in the human behavior used for model development.

Trying to make the problems with bioRxiv as clear as possible.

We all love science when it’s making life better, longer and easier. It’s a much harder sell when it points to inconvenient truths about our way of life

"When someone is honestly 55 percent right, that’s very good and there’s no use wrangling. And if someone is 60 percent right, it’s wonderful, it’s great luck, and let him thank God."

Science panels still rely on poor proxies to judge quality and impact.

A culture that normalizes hypercritical peers is a problem for scientists who want to reach beyond academe.

The editors of scholarly communications are under considerable pressure as recent trends in Gold Open Access characterize them as a luxury of the past.

In Canada, as in many other countries, there is an expectation that universities, the producers of the research, will advance innovation by starting up companies and by filing and licensing patents.

We can overcome the tyranny of inaccessible science hardware by building a movement for equity in science.

Progress in the sciences can only move as fast as humans can think—outsourcing to A.I. could change that.

Critics of two reports by the academies have cited potential disclosure problems among study panelists. Now, an official says, the idea of a policy review "has just gained more and more traction."

Computer science departments need to teach coders more than just how to code.

Take proposals that should never have been submitted out of the figures, and the chances of winning funding look a lot brighter.

Knowing the world may require giving up on understanding it.

The president’s proposed cuts to research funding would cripple American innovation. We should be spending more on R&D, not less.

How might machine learning shape the way we move through and interact with the immediate environment around us?

Patients in red states and blue states alike benefit from work funded by the National Institutes of Health

They say they don't have the time or incentives to do research — and that’s dangerous for translational medicine.

Thoughts and reflections on the role that open research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university.

Getting researcher buy-in to new tools and systems can be challenging - even when those tools are intended to help free them of administrative burden.

The academic paper has some inherent limitations—chief among them, that it can provide only a summary of a given research project.

When does a preprint become a publication?

Researchers should spend more trying to reproduce other scientists' results.