Open-Access Mandates and the Seductively False Promise of “Free”
Open-access mandates have the potential to significantly harm the publishing industry, writes the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property.
opinion articles
Send us a link
Open-access mandates have the potential to significantly harm the publishing industry, writes the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property.
The author of a new study of biomedical funding explains why he’s optimistic about young scientists’ futures.
Peer review recognition company Publons is set to expand under new owners. Could this boost peer review and stop it being seen as an onerous, thankless task?
Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions.
The President's proposed budget guts scientific research and protection, because it either doesn't know what science is for, or doesn't care.
In recent years, observers have noticed that articles for which an APC has been paid are not always made freely available. How pervasive is this problem?
Artificial intelligence is outperforming the human sort in a growing range of fields – but how do we make sure it behaves morally?
The evolution to a high-profit industry was never planned. Academics need to make the case for lower-cost journals.
Learned societies used to be seen as the guardians of academic prestige. They should act on that moral authority and reclaim their oversight of peer review, says Aileen Fyfe
"Our species has problems with violence." —Biologist Robert Sapolsky
Yes, collective missteps happen. But if anything, history shows how hard it is to get scientists to agree in the first place.
Papers need to include fewer claims and more proof to make the scientific literature more reliable.
The blockchain technology that underpins cryptographic currencies can support sustainability by building trust and avoiding corruption, explains Guillaume Chapron.
The role and the impact of citizen science in today’s world.
Is there an alternative to the standard academic career path that would actually make research work better?
Maybe Newtonian physics doesn’t need dark matter to work.
Independent professionals advance science in ways faculty-run labs cannot, and such positions keep talented people in research, argues Steven Hyman.
ResearchGate and similar services represent a “gamification” of research, drawing on features usually associated with online games, like rewards, rankings and levels.
Presenting science as a battle for truth against ignorance is an unhelpful exaggeration.
Without data on how artificial intelligence is affecting jobs, policymakers will fly blind into the next industrial revolution, warn Tom Mitchell and Erik Brynjolfsson.
We suggest a centralized facility for submitting to journals—one that would benefit scientists and not only publishers.
The STM Association Future Labs Committee explores the technology trends that will impact scholarly publishing by 2021.
Although automated publishing would allow researchers to share their findings faster, while also removing human bias, there are obvious ethical dilemmas related to this dehumanisation of the process.