Scientists, Stop Thinking Explaining Science Will Fix Things. It Won’t.
Scientists, Stop Thinking Explaining Science Will Fix Things. It Won’t.
Scientists need to learn how to communicate science strategically.
opinion articles
Send us a link
Scientists need to learn how to communicate science strategically.
Beth Simone Noveck urges researchers to work out how technology can improve public institutions.
An overview of recent events and the current state of preprints in the scholarly communications landscape.
Breaking the cycle in which only highly profitable drugs reach the market is not just the responsibility of government.
As climate change accelerates, a handful of scientists are eager to move ahead with experiments testing ways to counteract warming artificially.
Jürgen Schmidhuber says artificial intelligence will surpass humans’ in 2050, enabling robots to have fun, fall in love – and colonise the galaxy.
Philosopher and cognitive scientist David Chalmers warns about an AI-dominated future world without consciousness at a recent conference on artificial intelligence that also included Elon Musk, Ray Kurzweil, Sam Harris, Demis Hassabis and others.
Feeling a bit queasy these days? Small wonder. We are awash in disruption. Clearly, the d-word has long since become a trend in its own right.
Opinion piece by Ijad Madisch, co-founder and CEO of ResearchGate, the professional network that connects the world of science and opens research up to all.
Squeezed budgets for basic research will make it harder to respond to disease outbreaks and other global threats, say Arturo Casadevall & Ferric Fang.
Without data on how artificial intelligence is affecting jobs, policymakers will fly blind into the next industrial revolution, say Tom Mitchell and Erik Brynjolfsson.
The hypercompetitive world of biomedical research occasionally drives scientists to cheat. More often, scientists make decisions that undercut their results. That can lead colleagues astray.
Open data, code, materials and other reasons make blog posts score better on some core scientific values.
As researchers prepare for the science march, it's worth noting that the flip-side of Trump's anti-science is a sort of alt-science appeasement on the left.
You might see science as splashy headlines and a barrage of new results—but in the background are people with emotions and ambitions, politics, and a system that promotes publishing novel findings above all. A new paper on eel navigation highlights some of these systemic troubles.
How is machine learning becoming increasingly intertwined with a range of research fields?
Machines still have a long way to go before they learn like humans do – and that’s a potential danger to privacy, safety, and more.
The impact of crisis of reproducibility on the patent system.
Science diplomacy enables scientists to help tackle issues such as protectionism and government control over research findings, and could even mitigate the future threat of wars over knowledge and data.
The broad response was encouraging for science advocates and underscores the need to continue to push for open policies open.
Making the case for a European Open Access Platform.
We assume that creativity and innovation belong to the young. We’re wrong.
Creators of a free tool that locates open-access versions of research articles are hoping to make scholarly publishers rethink their business models.
Are we ready to give up traditional financial and governance control in favour of decentralised blockchain applications harbouring greater transparency?
The principles of openness, transparency, and reproducibility might be weaponized to defund and deny research.
Science isn’t just about explosions. But can children as young as 3 understand what it’s really about?
Canada’s experience with virtual panels shows that the status quo should be challenged, not accepted unthinkingly.