A coronavirus vaccine won't stop the pandemic without all countries having access to it.

Preprints servers have become a vital medium for the rapid sharing of scientific findings. However, this speed and openness has also contributed to the ability of low quality preprints to derail public debate and feed conspiracy theories. 

Young people think of college as an investment in their future. Now that future is changing in ways they can't apprehend.

Some scholars and academics wrongly ascribe scientists' legitimate disagreements about Covid-19 to ignorance or questionable political or other motivations.

The scientific community must take up cudgels in the battle against bunk.

Data sharing, open-source designs for medical equipment, and hobbyists are all being harnessed to combat COVID-19.

It won't be easy, but there's a path to get students back on track. Higher education will crumble without it.

Many outside observers might reasonably assume that science usually works like this. Yet open science is very far from the norm for most research.  Why is openly accessible science so important?

The new and improved Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings 2020 were published this week with as much online fanfare as THE could muster. Unfortunately,

Editors of academic journals have started noticing a trend: Women - who inevitably shoulder a greater share of family responsibilities - seem to be submitting fewer papers, while men are submitting up to 50 percent more than they usually would.

Experts have voiced growing frustration over the UK government’s claim that it is “following the science”, saying the refrain is being used to abdicate responsibility for political decisions.

For Elizabeth Gadd, the Covid-19 pandemic makes it clear that long standing issues with academic publications need to be addressed quickly and definitively.

No, there is no silver lining in the COVID-19 pandemic for climate change.

The coronavirus didn't break America. It revealed what was already broken.

How can qualitative researchers collect data during social-distancing measures?

Andy Westwood sets out the not-insignificant challenges that the government now faces in deciding what it wants from universities after the pandemic.

To create a better post-COVID-19 world requires democratic civic universities dedicated to producing knowledge and educating ethical, empathetic stude...

Do students really need a four-year residential experience?

Don't let academia's initiatives to advance women become just another way to game the research system, urges Charikleia Tzanakou.

I'm curious what lockdown will reveal about the 'maternal wall' that can block faculty advancement.

Emma Hardy says there will be no return to 'business as usual' after Covid-19 crisis. 

For 11 fateful days in March, the government ignored the best coronavirus advice, says public health professor Helen Ward. 

Business can play a powerful role in funding the pandemic's only viable exit strategy.

No one complained about the lack of evidence for 20-second hand-washing. So why did we treat face masks differently?

A systematic focus on governance – instead of, or at least alongside, open access – is vital for the future of publishing. Even if the for-profit publishing model is not going to be ‘killed’ any time soon, governance may still allow us to assert some control over it. Coupled with the publishing futures already being created and nurtured by library publishers, university presses and scholar-led collectives, we may be able to imagine a world that isn’t trapped in the logic of COVID-19.

Opinion piece argues that there is nothing 'natural' about the coronavirus pandemic: global capitalism has created it. Social distancing is like a general strike: an experiment taking back control over our own time.

The COVID crisis fuels a rapid acceleration in open science, but still a lot of crucial sources are paywalled.

Article explores what European funders are doing to drive change in scholarly communication, and argue that funders’ open policies could be backed up more by funders’ own practices.

No model whose purpose is to study the overall benefits of mitigations should end at a time-point before a steady-state is reached.

How, then, does an agency like NSF—which has considerable influence but limited direct authority—work with the community and other institutions to implement change on issues that cannot wait? The case of NSF's work to combat harassment in the science community, a persistent problem for decades that remains shockingly widespread, is illustrative.