Transparent peer review at Nature Communications
Starting Jan 2016 Nature Communications will publish peer reviews alongside with the paper.
Send us a link
Starting Jan 2016 Nature Communications will publish peer reviews alongside with the paper.
An analysis of the correlation between vice-chancellors’ pay and university ranking.
Honoring young researchers who champion rigorous, transparent research is a small step towards changing the culture of science.
Research can only exist with good and secure funding, but when obtaining funding becomes a dominant part of investigators’ activity, the system has a problem.
Researchers are urged to make their work accessible, but simplifying complex ideas doesn’t support great scholarship.
Some researchers think science should be small again.
Ask not what you can do for reproducibility; ask what reproducibility can do for you.
Too many senior scholars abuse their power when it comes to assigning credit.
Biology top journals share original data at the highest rate, and physics top journals share at the lowest rate.
Grantsmanship and service activities appeared as the most critical factors associated with faculty burnout.
Study examining whether NIH funded articles that were archived in PMC after the release of the 2008 NIH Public Access Policy show greater scholarly impact than comparable articles not archived in PMC.
Michael Eisen recently announced his new website, which features a new publication list that doesn’t mention journal names anywhere.
Commission proposes a research-friendly copyright for open science and innovation in Europe.
The Association of Universities in the Netherlands and Elsevier have reached an agreement in principle that marks a milestone in the Netherlands' transition to Open Access.
Royal Society to make ORCIDs mandatory for its journals.
‘Too many institutions’ are ready to ‘sweep fraud under the carpet’.
Executive compensation at private and public colleges.
We have little or no evidence that peer review 'works,' but we have lots of evidence of its downside.
And so, my fellow scientists: ask not what you can do for reproducibility; ask what reproducibility can do for you! Here, I present five reasons why working reproducibly pays off in the long run and is in the self-interest of every ambitious, career-oriented scientist.
There are too many PhD students for too few academic jobs - but with imagination, the problem could be solved.
For most young researchers, academic research is the love of their life. But how much can and should be sacrificed for this love?
Drivers of research may need to be tweaked to ensure better contribution to society.
An analysis of the essential tension identifies institutional forces that sustain tradition and suggestions of policy interventions to foster innovation.
The distribution of p-values in reported medical abstracts provides evidence for systematic error in the reporting of p-values..
Study presenting evidence for the existence of a citation advantage within astrophysics for papers that link to data.
We can't avoid making snap decisions about other people. Or can we?
What's the difference between ResearchGate, Academia.edu, and the institutional repository?
What everyone should know about cut-and-paste genetics.