Fraud Scheme Uncovered in China
The Chinese government finds almost 500 researchers guilty of misconduct in relation to a recent spate of retractions from a cancer journal.
Send us a link
The Chinese government finds almost 500 researchers guilty of misconduct in relation to a recent spate of retractions from a cancer journal.
From fungal networks sharing information and resources connecting all living things to the open source paradigm: Agroecology needs Open Access.
Günther Oettinger says research should be the only programme spared spending cuts as the EU weighs how to make up for losing the UK’s €11B per annum contribution.
SNSF grant-holders may deposit their scientific data in any recognized digital archive (commercial or not) that meets the FAIR principles.
Giving researchers the data skills they need to share, review, and validate each other’s work, writes Erin Becker.
It’s time for a global movement that pushes academic research beyond journal paywalls so it makes a difference in the world.
By joining the consortium, eLife will support the introduction of innovative new tools to help expand the current online open scholarly infrastructure.
To conserve Earth's remarkable species, we must also defend the importance of science and scientific integrity.
A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing.
A new paper argues that journal publishers should become much more transparent about their peer review practices.
Science should abandon its assembly-line mentality and rebuild for quality, not quantity, argues Michele Pagano.
A list of instutions cancelling their contracts with Elsevier by the end of 2017.
The 2014 REF results show only a very weak relationship between excellence in research and achieving societal impact.
Publishing platforms from The Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the European Commission alter Open Access.
The field of ecology is poised to take advantage of emerging technologies that facilitate the gathering, analyzing, and sharing of data, methods, and results.
What it means for researchers.
Life scientists told us whether they would like to share and read computationally reproducible research articles.
Researchers had to remove the bird because they were worried it’d teach the others.
There is too little sound research on journal peer review.
Sci-Hub's contains 68.9% of all 81.6 million scholarly articles, which rises to 85.2% for those published in closed access journals and 77.0% of the 5.2 million articles published by inactive journals.
An analysis of 15 million English scientific full-text articles published during the period 1823-2016.
Openness requires trust in close peers, but not necessarily in research community or society at large.
Open access looks set to shake up the humanities and social sciences book landscape for the better.